Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Identifying the Appropriate Dose and Schedule

Background In 2024, reimbursement for gemcitabine-docetaxel therapy (GEM-DOC; gemcitabine 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 8 every 21 days, GEM 900-DOC 70) to treat recurrent/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) was made in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of advanced/metastatic STS patients who underwent off-label gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research between February 2007 and October 2019. Results Of 115 enrolled patients, 51 were treated with GEM-DOC (26 patients received the dose as previously stated) and the other 64 with gemcitabine monotherapy. Objective response rates (ORR; 9.8% versus 4.7%), progression-free survival (PFS; 3.8 months versus 2.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 21.5 months versus 11.8 months) tended to be superior in GEM-DOC; the difference of the rate of following salvage treatment (GEM-DOC, 82.4%; gemcitabine monotherapy, 48.4%) could affect the OS. As for safety, severe adverse events (grade 3 {G3} or more) were more frequent in patients with GEM-DOC (hematologic, 80.4% versus 40.6%; non-hematologic, 19.6% versus 15.6%), including those using the stated dose (hematologic, 96.1%; non-hematologic, 26.9%). Conclusion The stated dose of GEM-DOC could be effective for STS but shows more toxicity compared to other dose settings or gemcitabine monotherapy. An investigation of appropriate dose settings by prospective clinical trial may be needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76149
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Identifying the Appropriate Dose and Schedule

Tetsuya Urasaki, Yasuyoshi Sato, X. Wang, Yuki Funauchi et al.
Cureus
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Identifying the Appropriate Dose and Schedule

Tetsuya Urasaki, Yasuyoshi Sato, X. Wang, Yuki Funauchi, Shunji Takahashi, Junichi Tomomatsu, Keiko Hayakawa, Naoki Fukuda, Makiko Ono, Kenji Nakano, Seiichi Matsumoto, Taisuke Tanizawa, Akihiro Ohmoto, Mayu Yunokawa, Naomi Hayashi, Keisuke Ae
article en

Abstract

Background In 2024, reimbursement for gemcitabine-docetaxel therapy (GEM-DOC; gemcitabine 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 8 every 21 days, GEM 900-DOC 70) to treat recurrent/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) was made in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of advanced/metastatic STS patients who underwent off-label gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research between February 2007 and October 2019. Results Of 115 enrolled patients, 51 were treated with GEM-DOC (26 patients received the dose as previously stated) and the other 64 with gemcitabine monotherapy. Objective response rates (ORR; 9.8% versus 4.7%), progression-free survival (PFS; 3.8 months versus 2.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 21.5 months versus 11.8 months) tended to be superior in GEM-DOC; the difference of the rate of following salvage treatment (GEM-DOC, 82.4%; gemcitabine monotherapy, 48.4%) could affect the OS. As for safety, severe adverse events (grade 3 {G3} or more) were more frequent in patients with GEM-DOC (hematologic, 80.4% versus 40.6%; non-hematologic, 19.6% versus 15.6%), including those using the stated dose (hematologic, 96.1%; non-hematologic, 26.9%). Conclusion The stated dose of GEM-DOC could be effective for STS but shows more toxicity compared to other dose settings or gemcitabine monotherapy. An investigation of appropriate dose settings by prospective clinical trial may be needed.

CureusVol. 16(12)
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Tokyo Hospital (JP), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), Japan Society of Chemotherapy (JP), Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.