Impact of immobilization devices on the inter-fractional setup error and planning target volume for pelvic radiation therapy

ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess inter-fractional setup errors for patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and to determine the optimal immobilization devices, we compared the margins between the clinical target volume and planning target volume while using full immobilization devices, partial immobilization devices, and no immobilization devices in terms of systematic and random errors. Materials and Methods: The study was retrospectively conducted at a tertiary care facility and involved three groups of patients. Group A did not use immobilization devices but instead used a knee rest and a U-shaped pillow for patient comfort during the simulation. Group B used a partial-immobilization configuration with an all-in-board (AIO) base plate, a neutral neck rest (NNR), and a knee rest during the simulation. The final group, Group C, used immobilization devices including an AIO baseplate and Vac-lok with NNR during the simulation. All three groups of patients were positioned in a head-first supine position with arms up. The departmental IGRT protocol was followed, with kV CBCT acquired for the first three consecutive days and twice-weekly kV-CBCT imaging for the remaining fractions. Translational displacements, systematic errors, and random errors were calculated for all patients. The CTV to PTV margins were then calculated using the well-known margin recipe Van-Herk formula. Results: The study included 125 patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy, and 1297 kV-CBCT images were analyzed. The estimated CTV to PTV margin was lower in Group C patients for all three directions, AP, ML, and CC. However, Group B setup errors were observed slightly more in all three directions than in Group C patients. The largest CTV to PTV margin was found to be 7.1 mm in the ML direction for Group A patients. Conclusion: To improve setup reproducibility and patient comfort while minimizing errors in all three directions, we recommend using a partial immobilization setup for patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_532_23
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of immobilization devices on the inter-fractional setup error and planning target volume for pelvic radiation therapy

Ashutosh Mukherjee, Priyanka Agarwal, Ajay Garg, Satyajit Pradhan et al.
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Impact of immobilization devices on the inter-fractional setup error and planning target volume for pelvic radiation therapy

Ashutosh Mukherjee, Priyanka Agarwal, Ajay Garg, Satyajit Pradhan, Jaiprakash Agarwal, Neil Upadhyay, Sambit Swarup Nanda
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess inter-fractional setup errors for patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and to determine the optimal immobilization devices, we compared the margins between the clinical target volume and planning target volume while using full immobilization devices, partial immobilization devices, and no immobilization devices in terms of systematic and random errors. Materials and Methods: The study was retrospectively conducted at a tertiary care facility and involved three groups of patients. Group A did not use immobilization devices but instead used a knee rest and a U-shaped pillow for patient comfort during the simulation. Group B used a partial-immobilization configuration with an all-in-board (AIO) base plate, a neutral neck rest (NNR), and a knee rest during the simulation. The final group, Group C, used immobilization devices including an AIO baseplate and Vac-lok with NNR during the simulation. All three groups of patients were positioned in a head-first supine position with arms up. The departmental IGRT protocol was followed, with kV CBCT acquired for the first three consecutive days and twice-weekly kV-CBCT imaging for the remaining fractions. Translational displacements, systematic errors, and random errors were calculated for all patients. The CTV to PTV margins were then calculated using the well-known margin recipe Van-Herk formula. Results: The study included 125 patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy, and 1297 kV-CBCT images were analyzed. The estimated CTV to PTV margin was lower in Group C patients for all three directions, AP, ML, and CC. However, Group B setup errors were observed slightly more in all three directions than in Group C patients. The largest CTV to PTV margin was found to be 7.1 mm in the ML direction for Group A patients. Conclusion: To improve setup reproducibility and patient comfort while minimizing errors in all three directions, we recommend using a partial immobilization setup for patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy.

Journal of Cancer Research and TherapeuticsVol. 20(6)
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.