Examining the drivers of ecological footprint components: Is pursuing food security environmentally costly for Nigeria?

• Food production increases the aggregate ecological footprint. • Geometric increase in food production increases the aggregate ecological footprint. • Food production increases footprints of built-up land, cropland, forest products. • Economic growth promotes carbon, cropland, fishing ground, and grazing land footprints. • Population causes a surge in aggregate ecological footprint. Amidst the fact that Nigeria’s ecological footprint exceeds its biocapacity by 58 percent, rapid population increase, and incessant farmers and herders conflict continue to pose a significant danger to the country’s food security drive. Motivated by this observation, this study attempts to examine whether the pursuit of food security agenda amidst population increase, and economic growth exhibits a significant impact on the country’s aggregate ecological footprint and footprints of built-up land, carbon, cropland, fishing grounds, forest products, and grazing land especially over the period 1981–2020. While the quantile regression method provides robustness to the main Kernel-based regularized least square approach, the Kernel-based regularized least square approach found that food production activities and geometric increase in food production, i.e., the square of food production, both increase the aggregate ecological footprint and footprints of built-up land, cropland, forest products. This revelation suggests serious environmental woe arising from the country’s attempt to improve food production. While the aggregate ecological footprint and its components, except for the fishing ground, experience a surge with an increase in population, economic growth promotes carbon, cropland, fishing ground, and grazing land footprints. The result of the investigation provides insight and measures for improving food security without necessarily increasing ecological pressure. The study suggests that policy measures that directly target recycling, preservation, and conservation of agricultural activities and products be encouraged to reduce the demand on the ecological components.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.113009
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the drivers of ecological footprint components: Is pursuing food security environmentally costly for Nigeria?

Chukwuemeka Echebiri, Andrew Adewale Alola, Hephzibah Onyeje Obekpa, Adejo Moses Adejo
14 citations
Ecological Indicators
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
15.81
article

Examining the drivers of ecological footprint components: Is pursuing food security environmentally costly for Nigeria?

Chukwuemeka Echebiri, Andrew Adewale Alola, Hephzibah Onyeje Obekpa, Adejo Moses Adejo
article en
14 citations

Abstract

• Food production increases the aggregate ecological footprint. • Geometric increase in food production increases the aggregate ecological footprint. • Food production increases footprints of built-up land, cropland, forest products. • Economic growth promotes carbon, cropland, fishing ground, and grazing land footprints. • Population causes a surge in aggregate ecological footprint. Amidst the fact that Nigeria’s ecological footprint exceeds its biocapacity by 58 percent, rapid population increase, and incessant farmers and herders conflict continue to pose a significant danger to the country’s food security drive. Motivated by this observation, this study attempts to examine whether the pursuit of food security agenda amidst population increase, and economic growth exhibits a significant impact on the country’s aggregate ecological footprint and footprints of built-up land, carbon, cropland, fishing grounds, forest products, and grazing land especially over the period 1981–2020. While the quantile regression method provides robustness to the main Kernel-based regularized least square approach, the Kernel-based regularized least square approach found that food production activities and geometric increase in food production, i.e., the square of food production, both increase the aggregate ecological footprint and footprints of built-up land, cropland, forest products. This revelation suggests serious environmental woe arising from the country’s attempt to improve food production. While the aggregate ecological footprint and its components, except for the fishing ground, experience a surge with an increase in population, economic growth promotes carbon, cropland, fishing ground, and grazing land footprints. The result of the investigation provides insight and measures for improving food security without necessarily increasing ecological pressure. The study suggests that policy measures that directly target recycling, preservation, and conservation of agricultural activities and products be encouraged to reduce the demand on the ecological components.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 170
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
15.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.