Crisis Management in Chinese Public Institutions: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

The research explores public perceptions of crisis management throughout the pandemic, highlighting important demographic factors such as age, gender, role, and geographic location. The primary goals are to examine how these demographics influence participation in crisis management discussions and to assess the effectiveness of the different strategies used during the health crisis. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research collected quantitative data through surveys targeting diverse participant groups, including public officials, healthcare workers, and the general public. The findings reveal significant insights: younger individuals and those aged 31-45 showed high engagement levels, while gender representation was balanced, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of perceptions. Notably, urban participants reported different experiences compared to rural counterparts, highlighting the importance of tailored public health responses. The study's implications underscore the necessity for robust preparedness plans, effective communication strategies, and enhanced inter-agency collaboration. Policymakers are encouraged to prioritize these areas to foster public trust and compliance during health crises. Moreover, the research suggests avenues for future studies, including the exploration of long-term impacts of crisis management strategies and the effectiveness of communication methods across diverse populations. Overall, this work contributes to a deeper understanding of public health governance and the dynamics of crisis management

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Social Science and Humanities Journal.
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59088/gi.v1i3.10
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis Management in Chinese Public Institutions: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Li Jianghui, Ikhsan Budi Riharjo
Global Social Science and Humanities Journal.
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Crisis Management in Chinese Public Institutions: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Li Jianghui, Ikhsan Budi Riharjo
article en

Abstract

The research explores public perceptions of crisis management throughout the pandemic, highlighting important demographic factors such as age, gender, role, and geographic location. The primary goals are to examine how these demographics influence participation in crisis management discussions and to assess the effectiveness of the different strategies used during the health crisis. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research collected quantitative data through surveys targeting diverse participant groups, including public officials, healthcare workers, and the general public. The findings reveal significant insights: younger individuals and those aged 31-45 showed high engagement levels, while gender representation was balanced, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of perceptions. Notably, urban participants reported different experiences compared to rural counterparts, highlighting the importance of tailored public health responses. The study's implications underscore the necessity for robust preparedness plans, effective communication strategies, and enhanced inter-agency collaboration. Policymakers are encouraged to prioritize these areas to foster public trust and compliance during health crises. Moreover, the research suggests avenues for future studies, including the exploration of long-term impacts of crisis management strategies and the effectiveness of communication methods across diverse populations. Overall, this work contributes to a deeper understanding of public health governance and the dynamics of crisis management

Global Social Science and Humanities Journal.Vol. 1(3)
Universitas Patria Artha (ID), Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.