Crisis Management in Chinese Public Institutions: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic
The research explores public perceptions of crisis management throughout the pandemic, highlighting important demographic factors such as age, gender, role, and geographic location. The primary goals are to examine how these demographics influence participation in crisis management discussions and to assess the effectiveness of the different strategies used during the health crisis. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research collected quantitative data through surveys targeting diverse participant groups, including public officials, healthcare workers, and the general public. The findings reveal significant insights: younger individuals and those aged 31-45 showed high engagement levels, while gender representation was balanced, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of perceptions. Notably, urban participants reported different experiences compared to rural counterparts, highlighting the importance of tailored public health responses. The study's implications underscore the necessity for robust preparedness plans, effective communication strategies, and enhanced inter-agency collaboration. Policymakers are encouraged to prioritize these areas to foster public trust and compliance during health crises. Moreover, the research suggests avenues for future studies, including the exploration of long-term impacts of crisis management strategies and the effectiveness of communication methods across diverse populations. Overall, this work contributes to a deeper understanding of public health governance and the dynamics of crisis management
Authors
- Li Jianghui
- Ikhsan Budi Riharjo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6399-396X)
Institutions
- Universitas Patria Artha (ID)
- Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Global Social Science and Humanities Journal.
- Published
- 2024-11-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.59088/gi.v1i3.10
- Primary Topic
- Disaster Management and Resilience
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00