Multiresponse kinetics with estimation of the experimental variance-covariance matrix. A full Bayesian analysis using Stan

Multiresponse analysis is a powerful technique to unravel complex kinetic chemical reaction schemes. Box and Draper (1965) showed that least-squares analysis of multiresponse measurements can be inappropriate if measurements are correlated, which will be frequently the case. Insight into the experimental variance-covariance matrix is therefore important, but this matrix is usually unknown. Using a Bayesian analysis, Box and Draper (1965) integrated out the experimental variance-covariance matrix to find an approximate solution for parameter estimates, called the determinant criterion. Nowadays, a full Bayesian analysis is possible via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling that does allow to estimate the full experimental variance-covariance matrix, next to the common kinetic parameter estimates. Two multiresponse examples are discussed to investigate this, using the probabilistic language Stan coupled to R. One example is the simulated data set used by Box and Draper (twelve runs with three components), the other a much-used real data set on heat-induced isomerization of α -pinene (nine runs with six components). One main result is that with both data sets the experimental variance-covariance matrix could be estimated, which gives much insight in the properties of the experimental data and further statistical analysis. Another main result is that, at least for the pinene data set, least-squares analysis leads to unrealistic precise estimates compared to the Bayesian solution, showing that it is worthwhile to use the Bayesian solution. An additional result is that the generally accepted mechanism for the pinene data set is questionable. Overall, the results show that Stan is a great addition to the toolkit of the kineticist for multiresponse kinetics analysis. • The unknown experimental variance-covariance matrix can be estimated from multiresponse measurements by a Bayesian approach. • Subjective assumptions about data structures can be avoided with the proposed Bayesian multiresponse analysis. • Multiresponse least-squares analysis underestimates parameter uncertainty compared to Bayesian analysis. • The probabilistic language Stan is very useful for thorough kinetic analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Engineering
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112455
Primary Topic
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiresponse kinetics with estimation of the experimental variance-covariance matrix. A full Bayesian analysis using Stan

M.A.J.S. van Boekel
Journal of Food Engineering
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
article

Multiresponse kinetics with estimation of the experimental variance-covariance matrix. A full Bayesian analysis using Stan

M.A.J.S. van Boekel
article en

Abstract

Multiresponse analysis is a powerful technique to unravel complex kinetic chemical reaction schemes. Box and Draper (1965) showed that least-squares analysis of multiresponse measurements can be inappropriate if measurements are correlated, which will be frequently the case. Insight into the experimental variance-covariance matrix is therefore important, but this matrix is usually unknown. Using a Bayesian analysis, Box and Draper (1965) integrated out the experimental variance-covariance matrix to find an approximate solution for parameter estimates, called the determinant criterion. Nowadays, a full Bayesian analysis is possible via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling that does allow to estimate the full experimental variance-covariance matrix, next to the common kinetic parameter estimates. Two multiresponse examples are discussed to investigate this, using the probabilistic language Stan coupled to R. One example is the simulated data set used by Box and Draper (twelve runs with three components), the other a much-used real data set on heat-induced isomerization of α -pinene (nine runs with six components). One main result is that with both data sets the experimental variance-covariance matrix could be estimated, which gives much insight in the properties of the experimental data and further statistical analysis. Another main result is that, at least for the pinene data set, least-squares analysis leads to unrealistic precise estimates compared to the Bayesian solution, showing that it is worthwhile to use the Bayesian solution. An additional result is that the generally accepted mechanism for the pinene data set is questionable. Overall, the results show that Stan is a great addition to the toolkit of the kineticist for multiresponse kinetics analysis. • The unknown experimental variance-covariance matrix can be estimated from multiresponse measurements by a Bayesian approach. • Subjective assumptions about data structures can be avoided with the proposed Bayesian multiresponse analysis. • Multiresponse least-squares analysis underestimates parameter uncertainty compared to Bayesian analysis. • The probabilistic language Stan is very useful for thorough kinetic analysis.

Journal of Food EngineeringVol. 391
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.