Efficacy of the Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation LCPT Compared to the Immediate-Release Formulation in Preventing Early Post-Transplant Diabetes in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Patients: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Pilot Study (EUDRACT: 2017
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and prediabetes (PreDM) are common after renal transplantation and increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), the LCPT formulation, with delayed absorption, offers higher bioavailability and a smoother time-concentration curve, potentially reducing beta-cell stress. <b>Methods</b>: This randomized pilot trial compared de novo immunosuppression with IR-Tac (twice daily) and LCPT (once daily). At-risk recipients (age ≥ 60 years or 18-59 years with metabolic syndrome) were enrolled and followed for 3 months. The primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of PTDM and PreDM, respectively. <b>Results</b>: 27 patients were randomized to IR-Tac and 25 to LCPT. The incidence of PTDM was comparable between groups [IR Tac: 18.5% (95% CI: 8.2-36.7%) vs. LCPT: 24% (95% CI: 11.5-43.4%); <i>p</i> = 0.7]. Although not statistically significant, the LCPT group exhibited a trend toward a reduction in PreDM incidence [IR-Tac: 40.7% (95% CI: 25-59%) vs. LCPT: 20% (95% CI: 9-39%); <i>p</i> = 0.1]. A sensitivity analysis showed similar results, with no significant differences in cumulative corticosteroid doses or baseline body mass index (BMI) between groups. The LCPT group showed a trend toward higher tacrolimus exposure at the end of the study [trough levels: IR-Tac group 8.3 (6.9-9.2) vs. LCPT group 9.4 (7.4-11.4) ng/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.05)], as well as fewer acute rejection episodes (none vs. three). Delayed graft function was more common in the IR-Tac group (37% vs. 8%; <i>p</i> = 0.01), and the eGFR was lower. Adverse events were comparable between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: The potential biological activity of LCPT in preventing glucose metabolic alterations in at-risk patients warrants further investigation.
Authors
- Antonio Rivero-González
- Laura Díaz‐Martín (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0444-8668)
- Eduardo De Bonis-Redondo
- Ana Elena Rodríguez‐Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0803-864X)
- Constantino Fernández Rivera (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2801-6752)
- Aurelio P. Rodríguez-Hernández
- Ana González‐Rinne
- Consuelo Rodríguez‐Jiménez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-3962)
- Alejandra Álvarez-González
- Domingo Marrero-Miranda
- Antonia María de Vera González
- Sergio Luis‐Lima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-8252)
- Lourdes Pérez Tamajón (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-5706)
- Domingo Hernández (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-2119)
- Rocío Seijo-Bestilleiro
- Esteban Porrini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-4662)
- Nuria Victoria Sánchez-Dorta
- Armando Torres (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-5173)
- Concepción Rodríguez-Adanero
- María Calvo-Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-5547)
- Estefanía Pérez-Carreño
- Marta López (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-3088)
- Cristina Romero-Delgado
- Diego Álvarez-Sosa
Institutions
- Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
- Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria (ES)
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247802
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.02
Funders
- Spanish Clinical Research Network
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- European Regional Development Fund