Low-Cost Improvements of an Old Flow Bench and a Discussion of Replacing Orifice Plate by MAF in its Flow Measurement

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Recognizing the significant challenges inherent in the analysis of periodic gas flow through reciprocating engines, one can easily appreciate the value of studying the steady flow through cylinder heads, manifolds, and exhaust systems. In these studies, flow benches are the cornerstone of the experimental apparatus needed to validate theoretical results or to perform purely experimental analysis. The Metal-Mechanics Department of IFSC owns a SuperFlow model SF-110 flow bench that has suffered some in house maintenance and received electronic sensors to allow computerized data acquisition. As the essential original sensors in this flow bench were liquid column manometer (for pressure difference across the test subject) and micromanometer (for pressure difference across the orifice plate used to measure the flow), the essential new sensors are electronic differential pressure sensors (installed in parallel with the original ones). In recent decades, however, the use of a mass air flow (MAF) sensor replacing the orifice plate and micromanometer, has been proposed in do it yourself (DIY) flow bench projects presented at the Internet. Some tests of a MAF sensor in the IFSC flow bench are being undertaken to support a discussion of its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the orifice plate. The present work discusses this substitution, as well the electronics and software used in the present version of the in house developed computerized data acquisition system. Preliminary results, difficulties and reliability issues faced by the authors in this development are discussed to share the lessons learned with the readers. The preliminary results presentation also ensues some discussion of the plethora of conflicting definitions and hypotheses that frequently make the flow bench results much more difficult to interpret than they should be.</div></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-36-0070
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-Cost Improvements of an Old Flow Bench and a Discussion of Replacing Orifice Plate by MAF in its Flow Measurement

Luciano Amaury dos Santos, Marcelo Vandresen
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Flow Measurement and Analysis
article

Low-Cost Improvements of an Old Flow Bench and a Discussion of Replacing Orifice Plate by MAF in its Flow Measurement

Luciano Amaury dos Santos, Marcelo Vandresen
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Recognizing the significant challenges inherent in the analysis of periodic gas flow through reciprocating engines, one can easily appreciate the value of studying the steady flow through cylinder heads, manifolds, and exhaust systems. In these studies, flow benches are the cornerstone of the experimental apparatus needed to validate theoretical results or to perform purely experimental analysis. The Metal-Mechanics Department of IFSC owns a SuperFlow model SF-110 flow bench that has suffered some in house maintenance and received electronic sensors to allow computerized data acquisition. As the essential original sensors in this flow bench were liquid column manometer (for pressure difference across the test subject) and micromanometer (for pressure difference across the orifice plate used to measure the flow), the essential new sensors are electronic differential pressure sensors (installed in parallel with the original ones). In recent decades, however, the use of a mass air flow (MAF) sensor replacing the orifice plate and micromanometer, has been proposed in do it yourself (DIY) flow bench projects presented at the Internet. Some tests of a MAF sensor in the IFSC flow bench are being undertaken to support a discussion of its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the orifice plate. The present work discusses this substitution, as well the electronics and software used in the present version of the in house developed computerized data acquisition system. Preliminary results, difficulties and reliability issues faced by the authors in this development are discussed to share the lessons learned with the readers. The preliminary results presentation also ensues some discussion of the plethora of conflicting definitions and hypotheses that frequently make the flow bench results much more difficult to interpret than they should be.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.