Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations

We study the relationship between moral values (“ought” statements) and factual beliefs (“is” statements). We show that thinking about values affects the beliefs people hold. This effect is mediated by prior political leanings, thereby contributing to the polarization of factual beliefs. We document these findings in a pre-registered online experiment with a nationally representative sample of over 1,800 individuals in the US. We also show that participants do not distort their beliefs in response to financial incentives to do so, suggesting that deep values exert a stronger motivational force than financial incentives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Economic Review
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104929
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations

Anna Becker, Kai Barron, Steffen Huck
1 citations
European Economic Review
Social and Intergroup Psychology
1.13
article

Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations

Anna Becker, Kai Barron, Steffen Huck
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We study the relationship between moral values (“ought” statements) and factual beliefs (“is” statements). We show that thinking about values affects the beliefs people hold. This effect is mediated by prior political leanings, thereby contributing to the polarization of factual beliefs. We document these findings in a pre-registered online experiment with a nationally representative sample of over 1,800 individuals in the US. We also show that participants do not distort their beliefs in response to financial incentives to do so, suggesting that deep values exert a stronger motivational force than financial incentives.

European Economic ReviewVol. 172
Stockholm University (SE), WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE), University College London (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.