Identifying university opinion leaders during the global crisis: information communication on official websites

This study investigates the news articles about the global crisis published by university official websites, aiming to identify opinion leaders from world-class universities. Based on the characteristics of opinion leaders, content analysis is used to analyze the case of COVID-19. The professionalism of all information is assessed through qualitative analysis, and activity and centrality are quantified by descriptive statistics and social network analysis, respectively. The findings of this study indicate that these three criteria can be used to assess universities. University opinion leaders show the characteristics of high professionalism, high activity and high centrality. Influenced by the institutional traits of world-class universities, university opinion leaders are divided into different types. Playing a comprehensive and multidimensional role may enable the public to quickly recognize their contributions through multiple channels, thereby gaining wide recognition. Moreover, extensive information sharing facilitates effective coordination of crisis management activities with global institutions. Some iconic brand achievements enhance their overall influence, producing a halo effect. This study is one of the first exploratory attempts to identify university opinion leaders, integrating communication theory with practical application in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04285-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying university opinion leaders during the global crisis: information communication on official websites

Xin Guo, Zhuolin Feng
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Higher Education Governance and Development
2.23
article

Identifying university opinion leaders during the global crisis: information communication on official websites

Xin Guo, Zhuolin Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the news articles about the global crisis published by university official websites, aiming to identify opinion leaders from world-class universities. Based on the characteristics of opinion leaders, content analysis is used to analyze the case of COVID-19. The professionalism of all information is assessed through qualitative analysis, and activity and centrality are quantified by descriptive statistics and social network analysis, respectively. The findings of this study indicate that these three criteria can be used to assess universities. University opinion leaders show the characteristics of high professionalism, high activity and high centrality. Influenced by the institutional traits of world-class universities, university opinion leaders are divided into different types. Playing a comprehensive and multidimensional role may enable the public to quickly recognize their contributions through multiple channels, thereby gaining wide recognition. Moreover, extensive information sharing facilitates effective coordination of crisis management activities with global institutions. Some iconic brand achievements enhance their overall influence, producing a halo effect. This study is one of the first exploratory attempts to identify university opinion leaders, integrating communication theory with practical application in higher education.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Yale University, Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Pennsylvania, California Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, Harvard University, University of Chicago, University of Washington, Johns Hopkins University, Carnegie Mellon University, McGill University, York University, Imperial College London, King's College London, University of Oxford, University of Manchester, University of Edinburgh, University of Bristol, Australian National University, National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science, University of Sydney, Monash University, University of Melbourne, University of Queensland, University of Toronto, Tsinghua University, University of Tokyo, Technische Universität München, Universität Zürich, Peking University, Sorbonne Université, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of California, San Diego
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Higher Education Governance and Development
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.