Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender

The workplace is an important setting for improving population psychological health. This study aimed to identify priority industries and populations in Australia with highest adverse effects of psychological distress. The study included 5834 workers aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the 2020 to 2021 National Health Survey. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress by industry, age group, and gender. Productivity losses were analyzed using negative binomial regression. Increased odds of experiencing distress were found for younger workers 18 to 29 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2. 45) and female workers (OR = 1.52). Industry of employment did not impact distress once age and gender were accounted for (<i>P</i> = .956). Being highly/very highly distressed resulted in a mean of 21.56 more distress-related loss days per year (0.78 vs 22.34) compared with low/moderate distress. Targeted and tailored workplace intervention programs for these groups are required to build a healthy and productive future workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241306477
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender

Janaki Amin, Louise A. Ellis, Abílio de Almeida Neto, Kristy Burns
3 citations
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
2.55
article

Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender

Janaki Amin, Louise A. Ellis, Abílio de Almeida Neto, Kristy Burns
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The workplace is an important setting for improving population psychological health. This study aimed to identify priority industries and populations in Australia with highest adverse effects of psychological distress. The study included 5834 workers aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the 2020 to 2021 National Health Survey. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress by industry, age group, and gender. Productivity losses were analyzed using negative binomial regression. Increased odds of experiencing distress were found for younger workers 18 to 29 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2. 45) and female workers (OR = 1.52). Industry of employment did not impact distress once age and gender were accounted for (<i>P</i> = .956). Being highly/very highly distressed resulted in a mean of 21.56 more distress-related loss days per year (0.78 vs 22.34) compared with low/moderate distress. Targeted and tailored workplace intervention programs for these groups are required to build a healthy and productive future workforce.

Asia Pacific Journal of Public HealthVol. 37(2-3)
Safe Work Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Workplace Health and Well-being
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.