Novel flame retardants (NFRs) in e-waste: Environmental burdens, health implications, and recommendations for safety assessment and sustainable management

Novel flame retardants (NFRs) have emerged as chemicals of environmental health concern due to their widespread use as an alternative to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) in electrical and electronic devices. Humans and ecosystems are under threat because of e-waste recycling procedures that may emit NFRs and other anthropogenic chemicals into the e-waste workplace and the surrounding environment. The individual toxicity of NFRs including novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), their combined effects and the underlying mechanisms of toxicity have remained poorly understood. Exposure assessment as well as chemical safety testing should focus on prioritizing N(B)FRs for regulation and management. Here, the occurrence of N(B)FRs in the vicinity and surroundings of e-waste recycling sites are presented. Important knowledge gaps and prospects for a more integrated, harmonized, and mechanistically positioned risk assessment strategy for N(B)FRs as well as possible economically feasible and environmentally sustainable approaches for removing them from complex matrices are highlighted. Overall, data in the ng to µg-ranges of N(B)FR in soil, dust, sediment, water and fish were found. Dust and soil sample concentrations ranged from the low ng to low µg/g range while water concentrations were always in the low ng/L range (∼0.5 to ∼4 ng/L). Concentration in fish was usually in the range of 3- ∼300 ng/g with two substances in the low to medium-high µg/g range (DBDPE, BTBPE). From the 20 N(B)FR analysed in sediment samples only 10 were above detection limit. Most chemicals were found in a low ng/g range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicology
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2024.154037
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel flame retardants (NFRs) in e-waste: Environmental burdens, health implications, and recommendations for safety assessment and sustainable management

Emeka Bright Ogbuene, Omodele Ibraheem, Chukwuebuka ThankGod Eze, Obianuju Oluchukwu Eze et al.
5 citations
Toxicology
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
1.57
article

Novel flame retardants (NFRs) in e-waste: Environmental burdens, health implications, and recommendations for safety assessment and sustainable management

Emeka Bright Ogbuene, Omodele Ibraheem, Chukwuebuka ThankGod Eze, Obianuju Oluchukwu Eze, Eberhard Küster
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Novel flame retardants (NFRs) have emerged as chemicals of environmental health concern due to their widespread use as an alternative to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) in electrical and electronic devices. Humans and ecosystems are under threat because of e-waste recycling procedures that may emit NFRs and other anthropogenic chemicals into the e-waste workplace and the surrounding environment. The individual toxicity of NFRs including novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), their combined effects and the underlying mechanisms of toxicity have remained poorly understood. Exposure assessment as well as chemical safety testing should focus on prioritizing N(B)FRs for regulation and management. Here, the occurrence of N(B)FRs in the vicinity and surroundings of e-waste recycling sites are presented. Important knowledge gaps and prospects for a more integrated, harmonized, and mechanistically positioned risk assessment strategy for N(B)FRs as well as possible economically feasible and environmentally sustainable approaches for removing them from complex matrices are highlighted. Overall, data in the ng to µg-ranges of N(B)FR in soil, dust, sediment, water and fish were found. Dust and soil sample concentrations ranged from the low ng to low µg/g range while water concentrations were always in the low ng/L range (∼0.5 to ∼4 ng/L). Concentration in fish was usually in the range of 3- ∼300 ng/g with two substances in the low to medium-high µg/g range (DBDPE, BTBPE). From the 20 N(B)FR analysed in sediment samples only 10 were above detection limit. Most chemicals were found in a low ng/g range.

ToxicologyVol. 511
University of Nigeria (NG), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NG), Federal University Oye Ekiti (NG)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.