Assessing the impact of stimulation environment and error probability on ErrP EEG response, detection and subject attention: an explorative study

Objective This study aims to investigate the impact of stimulus environments (Virtual Theatre vs Monitor) and error probabilities ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> vs <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m2"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> ) on attentional states, Error Potentials (ErrP), and machine learning classification performance. Approach EEG signals were recorded using different protocols, and features were extracted for subsequent analysis from single-trial response and attention level was computed from the second preceding error processing stimulation. Results The results indicate significant differences across conditions: the Monitor environment consistently elicited higher and faster ErrP responses and elevated attentional states compared to Virtual Theatre. Additionally, classification performance in the Monitor environment outperformed Virtual Theatre consistently. Further analysis revealed that the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m3"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> error probability protocol yielded increased ErrP responses, heightened attentional states, and superior classification performance compared to the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m4"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> protocol. Classification performance under the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m5"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> error probability condition consistently exceeded <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m6"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>75</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> validation and test sets. Moreover, a significant correlation between attention-related features and ErrP characteristics was observed, highlighting the intricate relationship between error processing and attentional engagement. Relevance These findings underscore the importance of considering stimulus environments and error probabilities in cognitive neuroscience research and machine learning applications. Understanding these factors can inform experimental design and model development, ultimately advancing our comprehension of cognitive processes and enhancing real-world applications of machine learning algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Virtual Reality
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1433082
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of stimulation environment and error probability on ErrP EEG response, detection and subject attention: an explorative study

Andrea Farabbi, Luca Mainardi
Frontiers in Virtual Reality
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Assessing the impact of stimulation environment and error probability on ErrP EEG response, detection and subject attention: an explorative study

Andrea Farabbi, Luca Mainardi
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate the impact of stimulus environments (Virtual Theatre vs Monitor) and error probabilities ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> vs <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m2"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> ) on attentional states, Error Potentials (ErrP), and machine learning classification performance. Approach EEG signals were recorded using different protocols, and features were extracted for subsequent analysis from single-trial response and attention level was computed from the second preceding error processing stimulation. Results The results indicate significant differences across conditions: the Monitor environment consistently elicited higher and faster ErrP responses and elevated attentional states compared to Virtual Theatre. Additionally, classification performance in the Monitor environment outperformed Virtual Theatre consistently. Further analysis revealed that the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m3"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> error probability protocol yielded increased ErrP responses, heightened attentional states, and superior classification performance compared to the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m4"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> protocol. Classification performance under the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m5"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> error probability condition consistently exceeded <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m6"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>75</mml:mn><mml:mi>%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> validation and test sets. Moreover, a significant correlation between attention-related features and ErrP characteristics was observed, highlighting the intricate relationship between error processing and attentional engagement. Relevance These findings underscore the importance of considering stimulus environments and error probabilities in cognitive neuroscience research and machine learning applications. Understanding these factors can inform experimental design and model development, ultimately advancing our comprehension of cognitive processes and enhancing real-world applications of machine learning algorithms.

Frontiers in Virtual RealityVol. 5
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.