Implications of cover crop management decisions on <i>Amaranthus</i> species density and biomass in temperate cropping systems: a meta-analysis

Abstract Weed-suppression benefits of cover crops (CCs) have long been recognized; however, the specific ability of CCs to suppress highly epidemic Amaranthus spp. (Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), smooth pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L.), and waterhemp [ Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer]) has not been widely discussed. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the implications of CC management decisions (CC type, planting and termination methods, residue fate after termination, and in-season weed management plan) on Amaranthus spp. weed density (ASWD) and Amaranthus spp. weed biomass (ASWB) compared with no CC (NCC) in temperate regions, including the United States and Canada. We found 41 studies conducted across the United States and Canada and extracted 595 paired observations. The results indicate that CCs reduced the ASWD by 58% in the early season (0 to 4 wk after crop planting [WAP]), by 48% in the midseason (5 to 8 WAP), and by 44% in the late season (&gt;8 WAP). Similarly, CCs reduced ASWB by 59%, 55%, and 37% in the early, mid-, and late season, respectively. Meta-regression analysis showed CCs terminated within 2.5 wk of crop planting reduced ASWD by ≥50%. CC biomass required to reduce ASWD and ASWB by 50% was 4,079 kg ha −1 for ASWD and 5,352 kg ha −1 for ASWB. Among CC types, grasses and mixtures reduced ASWD by 60% and 77% in early season, 53% and 59% in midseason, and 44% and 47% in late season. Legume CCs were effective only during the early season (47% ASWD reduction), while brassicas did not affect ASWD. CC residues remaining on the soil surface were more effective for reducing ASWD than incorporation. CCs did not affect ASWD or ASWB compared with NCC when herbicides were used for in-season weed management. In general, CCs were found to reduce ASWD and ASWB and therefore can be used as an effective tool for integrated management of Amaranthus spp.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Science
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.99
Primary Topic
Seed and Plant Biochemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of cover crop management decisions on Amaranthus species density and biomass in temperate cropping systems: a meta-analysis

Humberto Blanco‐Canqui, Ankit Yadav, Sam E. Wortman, Amit J. Jhala et al.
Weed Science
Seed and Plant Biochemistry
article

Implications of cover crop management decisions on Amaranthus species density and biomass in temperate cropping systems: a meta-analysis

Humberto Blanco‐Canqui, Ankit Yadav, Sam E. Wortman, Amit J. Jhala, Saleh Taghvaeian, Mandeep Singh, Vipin Kumar, Resham Bahadur Thapa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Weed-suppression benefits of cover crops (CCs) have long been recognized; however, the specific ability of CCs to suppress highly epidemic Amaranthus spp. (Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), smooth pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L.), and waterhemp [ Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer]) has not been widely discussed. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the implications of CC management decisions (CC type, planting and termination methods, residue fate after termination, and in-season weed management plan) on Amaranthus spp. weed density (ASWD) and Amaranthus spp. weed biomass (ASWB) compared with no CC (NCC) in temperate regions, including the United States and Canada. We found 41 studies conducted across the United States and Canada and extracted 595 paired observations. The results indicate that CCs reduced the ASWD by 58% in the early season (0 to 4 wk after crop planting [WAP]), by 48% in the midseason (5 to 8 WAP), and by 44% in the late season (&gt;8 WAP). Similarly, CCs reduced ASWB by 59%, 55%, and 37% in the early, mid-, and late season, respectively. Meta-regression analysis showed CCs terminated within 2.5 wk of crop planting reduced ASWD by ≥50%. CC biomass required to reduce ASWD and ASWB by 50% was 4,079 kg ha −1 for ASWD and 5,352 kg ha −1 for ASWB. Among CC types, grasses and mixtures reduced ASWD by 60% and 77% in early season, 53% and 59% in midseason, and 44% and 47% in late season. Legume CCs were effective only during the early season (47% ASWD reduction), while brassicas did not affect ASWD. CC residues remaining on the soil surface were more effective for reducing ASWD than incorporation. CCs did not affect ASWD or ASWB compared with NCC when herbicides were used for in-season weed management. In general, CCs were found to reduce ASWD and ASWB and therefore can be used as an effective tool for integrated management of Amaranthus spp.

Weed ScienceVol. 73
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Tennessee State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Seed and Plant Biochemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.