Missing Links

Abstract The author assesses the effectiveness of Thomas Schreiner’s exegesis of Revelation 20 in his recent technical Revelation commentary (Baker Academic, 2023). Schreiner boldly takes up the new creation millennialism interpretative solution, following J. Webb Mealy’s monographs After the Thousand Years and New Creation Millennialism , but he resists perhaps the most significant potential consequence of that model, namely, that John’s picture of the final fate of the stubbornly unrepentant is to be imagined as annihilation in a temporary pool (Gr. λίμνη ) of fire, and not, as commonly understood, as everlasting torment in a permanent lake of fire. The author argues that Schreiner’s resisting of this element leads to an exposition that misses crucial ties between Rev. 19–20 and the Isaiah Apocalypse (Isa. 24:1–27:5) and to a disjointed and at points internally inconsistent story of the end of the unrepentant.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œEvangelical quarterly
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-09504003
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missing Links

J. Webb Mealy
˜The œEvangelical quarterly
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Missing Links

J. Webb Mealy
article en

Abstract

Abstract The author assesses the effectiveness of Thomas Schreiner’s exegesis of Revelation 20 in his recent technical Revelation commentary (Baker Academic, 2023). Schreiner boldly takes up the new creation millennialism interpretative solution, following J. Webb Mealy’s monographs After the Thousand Years and New Creation Millennialism , but he resists perhaps the most significant potential consequence of that model, namely, that John’s picture of the final fate of the stubbornly unrepentant is to be imagined as annihilation in a temporary pool (Gr. λίμνη ) of fire, and not, as commonly understood, as everlasting torment in a permanent lake of fire. The author argues that Schreiner’s resisting of this element leads to an exposition that misses crucial ties between Rev. 19–20 and the Isaiah Apocalypse (Isa. 24:1–27:5) and to a disjointed and at points internally inconsistent story of the end of the unrepentant.

˜The œEvangelical quarterlyVol. 95(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.