National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption

Abstract International initiatives, such as the Bonn Challenge, Trillion Tree Campaign, New York Declaration on Forests, and United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, have set ambitious targets for forest restoration. However, the effectiveness and cost‐efficiency of large‐scale forest restoration projects (FRP) in different climatic zones, and the trade‐off between carbon sequestration and water consumption caused by FRP are poorly understood. Here, we conducted a comprehensive examination of 2,778 counties in China, where the world's most ambitious FRP was executed during the past two decades. Results showed that, on average, each square kilometer of FRP yielded an additional 0.6 square kilometers of forests and contributed an extra 1354.9 tC to forest carbon storage, with the aridity index emerging as a key influencer. The actual expenditure incurred per ton of increased forest carbon storage amounted to approximately 118.9 USD in average, with the lowest in Southwest at 50.9 USD. The expansion of forest cover and enhanced biomass storage led to a notable increase in water consumption, and the trade‐off was particularly pronounced in arid regions. Our study provides empirical evidence that FRP is an effective and cost‐efficient climate change mitigation strategy for humid climate zones under current carbon prices. However, FRP is not cost‐efficient in semi‐arid and arid regions. These findings have significant implications for global forest restoration endeavors and formulating sound climate change mitigation policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ef004976
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption

Huijuan Xia, Quanfa Zhang, Tiehu He, Yulong Zhang et al.
12 citations
Earth s Future
Forest Management and Policy
3.39
article

National Forest Restoration Projects in China: Cost‐Efficiency, and Trade‐Off Between Carbon Sequestration and Water Consumption

Huijuan Xia, Quanfa Zhang, Tiehu He, Yulong Zhang, Xia Wang, Jiehao Zhang, Kerong Zhang
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract International initiatives, such as the Bonn Challenge, Trillion Tree Campaign, New York Declaration on Forests, and United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, have set ambitious targets for forest restoration. However, the effectiveness and cost‐efficiency of large‐scale forest restoration projects (FRP) in different climatic zones, and the trade‐off between carbon sequestration and water consumption caused by FRP are poorly understood. Here, we conducted a comprehensive examination of 2,778 counties in China, where the world's most ambitious FRP was executed during the past two decades. Results showed that, on average, each square kilometer of FRP yielded an additional 0.6 square kilometers of forests and contributed an extra 1354.9 tC to forest carbon storage, with the aridity index emerging as a key influencer. The actual expenditure incurred per ton of increased forest carbon storage amounted to approximately 118.9 USD in average, with the lowest in Southwest at 50.9 USD. The expansion of forest cover and enhanced biomass storage led to a notable increase in water consumption, and the trade‐off was particularly pronounced in arid regions. Our study provides empirical evidence that FRP is an effective and cost‐efficient climate change mitigation strategy for humid climate zones under current carbon prices. However, FRP is not cost‐efficient in semi‐arid and arid regions. These findings have significant implications for global forest restoration endeavors and formulating sound climate change mitigation policies.

Earth s FutureVol. 12(12)
Duke University (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Wuhan Botanical Garden (CN), Institute of Wetland Research (CN), Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Forest Management and Policy
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.