Predictive Value of Initial F-18 FDG PET/CT for Identifying EGFR and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Abs tractAim: Since the importance of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in predicting treatment response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is well known, we aimed to evaluate whether initial 18F FDG PET/CT imaging could noninvasively predict epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene (KRAS) mutation states in this patient group.Methods: This retrospective observational study examined patients with NSCLC who underwent 18F FDG PET/CT for staging from August 2021 to January 2024.Age, sex, smoking status, pathological data, EGFR and KRAS mutation status, and metabolic and volumetric PET parameters were recorded.Groups were based on gene mutation status as follows: EGFR-mt vs. EGFR wild-type (EGFRwt) and KRAS-mt vs. KRAS-wt.Results: Ninety-nine patients with a mean age of 62.96 9.66 (range: 37-87) were included.The EGFR-mt group had lower MTV (p=0.015) and TLG (p=0.017)values.MTV had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.667 (95% CI: 0.547 -0.788, p = 0.015), and with a 24.9 cut-off, yielded 60.87% sensitivity, 68.42% specificity, and 66.67% accuracy to detect EGFR-mt.For TLG, the AUC was 0.664 (95% CI: 0.540 -0.788, p=0.017) and a 408.1 cut-off yielded 86.96% sensitivity, 43.42% specificity, 53.54% accuracy, and 91.67% NPV.KRAS-mt was detected in 34 (34.34%)patients, and there were no significant differences between the KRAS-mt and KRAS-wt groups in terms of PET parameters. Conclusion:Primary tumor parameters derived from initial 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can predict EGFR mutation status but not KRAS mutation status.The high negative predictive value of TLG can be used to rule out EGFR-mt status, possibly preventing unnecessary treatments in patients without favorable genetic properties, especially when genetic analyses are not possible.