Do we interpret ambiguity and feel according to how we define ourselves? Relationships between self-perception, interpretation biases, and their role on emotional symptoms

These results suggest that self-discrepancies could be understood as indices of the activation of latent cognitive schemas, which would influence subsequent stages of information processing, such as negative interpretations of ambiguous information, partly accounting for the emergence and/or maintenance of emotional symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1502130
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do we interpret ambiguity and feel according to how we define ourselves? Relationships between self-perception, interpretation biases, and their role on emotional symptoms

Iván Blanco, Óscar Martín-García, Álvaro Sánchez-López
2 citations
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
1.02
article

Do we interpret ambiguity and feel according to how we define ourselves? Relationships between self-perception, interpretation biases, and their role on emotional symptoms

Iván Blanco, Óscar Martín-García, Álvaro Sánchez-López
article en
2 citations

Abstract

These results suggest that self-discrepancies could be understood as indices of the activation of latent cognitive schemas, which would influence subsequent stages of information processing, such as negative interpretations of ambiguous information, partly accounting for the emergence and/or maintenance of emotional symptoms.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 15
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.