DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF A NUMBER OF ANAMNESTIC, CLINICAL AND LABORATORY DATA USED IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN IN CHILDREN

Вackground. Acute abdominal pain is one of the most common symptoms in pediatric practice. The problems of rapid, accurate and timely differential diagnosis have not been solved to date. Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of a number of anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data used in differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in children. Material and methods. A prospective randomized blind controlled clinical study. 597 children aged from one year to 18 years with acute abdominal pain were examined according to the analytical chart developed in the clinic. Results. The use of such clinical signs as “nausea, vomiting, pain migration, local pain in the right iliac region” in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain is of subsidiary importance. Diagnostically the most important and informative for stratification aimed to distinguish patients with possible destructive appendicitis are such symptoms as “anorexia, muscle tension, Shchetkin’s symptom, Razdolsky’s symptom”, the number of leukocytes, the number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. It is advisable to use the absolute neutrophil count instead of the relative neutrophil count. None of the abovementioned symptoms has sufficient diagnostic value to establish the diagnosis of “destructive appendicitis”. Conclusion. Consistent evaluation of these symptoms may improve the quality of differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in children and to distinguish patients requiring surgical treatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hepatology and Gastroenterology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25298/2616-5546-2024-8-2-105-112
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF A NUMBER OF ANAMNESTIC, CLINICAL AND LABORATORY DATA USED IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN IN CHILDREN

A. V. Khudovtsova, В. Г. Вакульчик, K. A. Halavach, M. H. Myslivets
Hepatology and Gastroenterology
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF A NUMBER OF ANAMNESTIC, CLINICAL AND LABORATORY DATA USED IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN IN CHILDREN

A. V. Khudovtsova, В. Г. Вакульчик, K. A. Halavach, M. H. Myslivets
article en

Abstract

Вackground. Acute abdominal pain is one of the most common symptoms in pediatric practice. The problems of rapid, accurate and timely differential diagnosis have not been solved to date. Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of a number of anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data used in differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in children. Material and methods. A prospective randomized blind controlled clinical study. 597 children aged from one year to 18 years with acute abdominal pain were examined according to the analytical chart developed in the clinic. Results. The use of such clinical signs as “nausea, vomiting, pain migration, local pain in the right iliac region” in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain is of subsidiary importance. Diagnostically the most important and informative for stratification aimed to distinguish patients with possible destructive appendicitis are such symptoms as “anorexia, muscle tension, Shchetkin’s symptom, Razdolsky’s symptom”, the number of leukocytes, the number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. It is advisable to use the absolute neutrophil count instead of the relative neutrophil count. None of the abovementioned symptoms has sufficient diagnostic value to establish the diagnosis of “destructive appendicitis”. Conclusion. Consistent evaluation of these symptoms may improve the quality of differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in children and to distinguish patients requiring surgical treatment.

Hepatology and GastroenterologyVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.