Context Matters: Understanding Why Medieval Legislators Chose to Regulate Women's Pregnant Bodies

Abstract The article was inspired by Justice Alito's selective and often misleading use of the medieval history of abortion law to justify the overturning of Roe v. Wade . Hoping to offer a corrective view of the larger conversation about abortion during the premodern era, this article hopes to drive home a number of points. First, modern authorities need to acknowledge that the word “abortion” ( aborsus ) meant something different then than it does now. Second, at its origins, abortion was conceived as a crime against husbands, and thus it falls into a larger body of misogynous law designed to protect men and their heirs from women who exploited their reproductive potential to trick men out of their rightful inheritance. And third, medieval laws against those who provided abortions labeled them as witches or poisoners. Medieval laws about abortion are thus intertwined with fears of the devil and of the woman's body as poison.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and History Review
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248024000415
Primary Topic
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Context Matters: Understanding Why Medieval Legislators Chose to Regulate Women's Pregnant Bodies

Sara M. Butler
Law and History Review
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
article

Context Matters: Understanding Why Medieval Legislators Chose to Regulate Women's Pregnant Bodies

Sara M. Butler
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article was inspired by Justice Alito's selective and often misleading use of the medieval history of abortion law to justify the overturning of Roe v. Wade . Hoping to offer a corrective view of the larger conversation about abortion during the premodern era, this article hopes to drive home a number of points. First, modern authorities need to acknowledge that the word “abortion” ( aborsus ) meant something different then than it does now. Second, at its origins, abortion was conceived as a crime against husbands, and thus it falls into a larger body of misogynous law designed to protect men and their heirs from women who exploited their reproductive potential to trick men out of their rightful inheritance. And third, medieval laws against those who provided abortions labeled them as witches or poisoners. Medieval laws about abortion are thus intertwined with fears of the devil and of the woman's body as poison.

Law and History ReviewVol. 43(1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Ohio State University, University of Cambridge
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Context Matters: Understanding Why Medieval Legislators Chose to Regulate Women's Pregnant Bodies — Sara M. Butler · Law and History Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS