Repatriation and Ethnographic Archives: Katherine Routledge's Mangareva Field Notes in the Royal Geographic Society Collections

ABSTRACT Just over 100 years after Katherine Routledge's 1921–1922 expedition to the Mangareva Islands, digitized copies of a portion of her field notes from the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) in London were returned to the source community in French Polynesia. Historical ethnographic fieldnotes represent an underutilized primary source of cultural knowledge in repatriation activities as part of a broader push by cultural institutions to decolonize. Broadening access to this kind of information raises unresolved issues about how best to manage archival documents among Oceanic communities living in a digital world. Ongoing questions include the legitimacy of digital return of documents or objects as opposed to physical originals; and how much use or value source communities receive from such returns. We advocate for addressing these on a case‐by‐case basis, in conversation with community collaborators, and explain our reasoning and approaches in this Mangarevan example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Curator The Museum Journal
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12668
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repatriation and Ethnographic Archives: Katherine Routledge's Mangareva Field Notes in the Royal Geographic Society Collections

James L. Flexner, Sarah L. Evans, Albert Faahei Hugues
1 citations
Curator The Museum Journal
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
1.96
article

Repatriation and Ethnographic Archives: Katherine Routledge's Mangareva Field Notes in the Royal Geographic Society Collections

James L. Flexner, Sarah L. Evans, Albert Faahei Hugues
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Just over 100 years after Katherine Routledge's 1921–1922 expedition to the Mangareva Islands, digitized copies of a portion of her field notes from the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) in London were returned to the source community in French Polynesia. Historical ethnographic fieldnotes represent an underutilized primary source of cultural knowledge in repatriation activities as part of a broader push by cultural institutions to decolonize. Broadening access to this kind of information raises unresolved issues about how best to manage archival documents among Oceanic communities living in a digital world. Ongoing questions include the legitimacy of digital return of documents or objects as opposed to physical originals; and how much use or value source communities receive from such returns. We advocate for addressing these on a case‐by‐case basis, in conversation with community collaborators, and explain our reasoning and approaches in this Mangarevan example.

Curator The Museum JournalVol. 68(3)
Royal Geographical Society (GB), The University of Sydney (AU), University of French Polynesia (PF)
Department of Education and Training
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.