Disk Kinematics at High Redshift: DysmalPy’s Extension to 3D Modeling and Comparison with Different Approaches

Abstract Spatially resolved emission-line kinematics are invaluable for investigating fundamental galaxy properties and have become increasingly accessible for galaxies at z ≳0.5 through sensitive near-infrared imaging spectroscopy and millimeter interferometry. Kinematic modeling is at the core of the analysis and interpretation of such data sets, which at high z present challenges due to the lower signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and resolution compared to the data of local galaxies. We present and test the 3D fitting functionality of DysmalPy , examining how well it recovers the intrinsic disk rotation velocity and velocity dispersion, using a large suite of axisymmetric models, covering a range of galaxy properties and observational parameters typical of z ∼ 1−3 star-forming galaxies. We also compare DysmalPy ’s recovery performance to that of two other commonly used codes, GalPak 3 D and 3D Barolo , which we use in turn to create additional sets of models to benchmark DysmalPy . Over the ranges of S/N, resolution, mass, and velocity dispersion explored, the rotation velocity is accurately recovered by all tools. The velocity dispersion is recovered well at high S/N, but the impact of methodology differences is more apparent. In particular, template differences for parametric tools and S/N sensitivity for the nonparametric tool can lead to differences of up to a factor of 2. Our tests highlight and the importance of deep, high-resolution data and the need for careful consideration of (i) the choice of priors (parametric approaches); and (ii) the masking (all approaches); and (iii), more generally, the evaluating of the suitability of each approach to the specific data at hand. This paper accompanies the public release of DysmalPy .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad90b5
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disk Kinematics at High Redshift: DysmalPy’s Extension to 3D Modeling and Comparison with Different Approaches

Juan M. Espejo Salcedo, A. Renzini, A. Nestor Shachar, R. Davies et al.
7 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
2.32
article

Disk Kinematics at High Redshift: DysmalPy’s Extension to 3D Modeling and Comparison with Different Approaches

Juan M. Espejo Salcedo, A. Renzini, A. Nestor Shachar, R. Davies, R. Genzel, Rodrigo Herrera-Camus, Lilian L. Lee, D. Lutz, Thomas Shimizu, Stijn Wuyts, Hannah Übler, Stavros Pastras, A. Sternberg, Sedona H. Price, Daizhong Liu, L. J. Tacconi, N. M. Förster Schreiber
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Spatially resolved emission-line kinematics are invaluable for investigating fundamental galaxy properties and have become increasingly accessible for galaxies at z ≳0.5 through sensitive near-infrared imaging spectroscopy and millimeter interferometry. Kinematic modeling is at the core of the analysis and interpretation of such data sets, which at high z present challenges due to the lower signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and resolution compared to the data of local galaxies. We present and test the 3D fitting functionality of DysmalPy , examining how well it recovers the intrinsic disk rotation velocity and velocity dispersion, using a large suite of axisymmetric models, covering a range of galaxy properties and observational parameters typical of z ∼ 1−3 star-forming galaxies. We also compare DysmalPy ’s recovery performance to that of two other commonly used codes, GalPak 3 D and 3D Barolo , which we use in turn to create additional sets of models to benchmark DysmalPy . Over the ranges of S/N, resolution, mass, and velocity dispersion explored, the rotation velocity is accurately recovered by all tools. The velocity dispersion is recovered well at high S/N, but the impact of methodology differences is more apparent. In particular, template differences for parametric tools and S/N sensitivity for the nonparametric tool can lead to differences of up to a factor of 2. Our tests highlight and the importance of deep, high-resolution data and the need for careful consideration of (i) the choice of priors (parametric approaches); and (ii) the masking (all approaches); and (iii), more generally, the evaluating of the suitability of each approach to the specific data at hand. This paper accompanies the public release of DysmalPy .

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 978(1)
Tel Aviv University (IL), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Concepción (CL), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), Purple Mountain Observatory (CN), Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT), Flatiron Institute (US), University of Bath (GB), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Kavli Foundation, European Commission, Isaac Newton Trust, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.