ALGORITHMIC, UNDIFFERENTIATED AND DIFFERENTIATED THINKING IN MEDICAL PRACTICE

This article discusses different ways of thinking used in medical practice. Authors analyze questions concerning medical decision making, and examine impact they have on quality of medical care. First kind of thinking under inquiring is algorithmic thinking. It is used by doctors when they adhere to algorithms and protocols in making decision. Algorithms can standardize diagnosis and treatment process, which can reduce risk of error and improve efficiency of medical assistance. However, algorithmic thinking can lead to standardized approaches, having as consequence ignoring of individual patient characteristics. Second kind of thinking that shall be examined is undifferentiated thinking. Undifferentiated thinking can lead to missing important diagnostic signs and inappropriate treatment based on subjective assumptions. Third kind of thinking discussed in the article is differentiated thinking. Using this kind of thinking, doctors take into account individual characteristics of each patient and apply flexible approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Differentiated thinking allows health care to be tailored to a specific situation, which may increase its effectiveness. However, differentiated thinking requires that doctors ought to have in-depth knowledge and experience, as well as the ability to analyze complex medical data. The article discusses relevance of different kinds of thinking in medical practice and encourages doctors to develop their differentiated thinking skills. It shall improve quality and efficiency of medical care by taking into account individual needs of each patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARHE
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2024.42.221-234
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ALGORITHMIC, UNDIFFERENTIATED AND DIFFERENTIATED THINKING IN MEDICAL PRACTICE

Emiliano Mettini, Narine L. Wiegel
ARHE
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

ALGORITHMIC, UNDIFFERENTIATED AND DIFFERENTIATED THINKING IN MEDICAL PRACTICE

Emiliano Mettini, Narine L. Wiegel
article en

Abstract

This article discusses different ways of thinking used in medical practice. Authors analyze questions concerning medical decision making, and examine impact they have on quality of medical care. First kind of thinking under inquiring is algorithmic thinking. It is used by doctors when they adhere to algorithms and protocols in making decision. Algorithms can standardize diagnosis and treatment process, which can reduce risk of error and improve efficiency of medical assistance. However, algorithmic thinking can lead to standardized approaches, having as consequence ignoring of individual patient characteristics. Second kind of thinking that shall be examined is undifferentiated thinking. Undifferentiated thinking can lead to missing important diagnostic signs and inappropriate treatment based on subjective assumptions. Third kind of thinking discussed in the article is differentiated thinking. Using this kind of thinking, doctors take into account individual characteristics of each patient and apply flexible approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Differentiated thinking allows health care to be tailored to a specific situation, which may increase its effectiveness. However, differentiated thinking requires that doctors ought to have in-depth knowledge and experience, as well as the ability to analyze complex medical data. The article discusses relevance of different kinds of thinking in medical practice and encourages doctors to develop their differentiated thinking skills. It shall improve quality and efficiency of medical care by taking into account individual needs of each patient.

ARHEVol. 21(42)
Rostov State Medical University (RU), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.