An Access-Focused Patient-Centric Value Assessment Framework for Medication Formulary Decision-Making in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

The healthcare system in the United States (US) is complex and often fragmented across national and regional health plans which exhibit substantial variability in benefit design and formulary policies for accessing medications. We propose an access-focused value assessment framework for formulary decision-making for medications to manage immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), where patients are at the center of this framework. Formulary decision-making for IMID medications can be a challenging, even daunting, task with continuously evolving and enhanced treat-to-target goals. Given the complexity of the US healthcare system, patients and their caregivers need assurance from formulary decision-makers that rapid, predictable, and sustained access to both well-established treatments and innovative therapies will be a priority, with a particular emphasis on continuity of effective care. This access-focused patient-centric (APAC) value assessment approach encompasses three "value components"-higher therapeutic goals, better health-related quality of life, and improved work productivity-the monetization of which can be derived using data from clinical trials when real-world data are yet to become available. Measures and assessment approaches are outlined to serve as a pragmatic tool for decision-makers in the US to ensure timely delivery and sustained access of clinically indicated therapies aimed to improve patient outcomes, enhance equity, and increase efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Therapy
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03076-5
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Access-Focused Patient-Centric Value Assessment Framework for Medication Formulary Decision-Making in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Yifei Liu, Diana I Brixner, Pankaj Patel, Bruce W. Sherman et al.
Advances in Therapy
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

An Access-Focused Patient-Centric Value Assessment Framework for Medication Formulary Decision-Making in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Yifei Liu, Diana I Brixner, Pankaj Patel, Bruce W. Sherman, Louis P. Garrison, Qing Liu, A. Mark Fendrick, Manish Mittal, Jerry Clewell, Min Yang
article en

Abstract

The healthcare system in the United States (US) is complex and often fragmented across national and regional health plans which exhibit substantial variability in benefit design and formulary policies for accessing medications. We propose an access-focused value assessment framework for formulary decision-making for medications to manage immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), where patients are at the center of this framework. Formulary decision-making for IMID medications can be a challenging, even daunting, task with continuously evolving and enhanced treat-to-target goals. Given the complexity of the US healthcare system, patients and their caregivers need assurance from formulary decision-makers that rapid, predictable, and sustained access to both well-established treatments and innovative therapies will be a priority, with a particular emphasis on continuity of effective care. This access-focused patient-centric (APAC) value assessment approach encompasses three "value components"-higher therapeutic goals, better health-related quality of life, and improved work productivity-the monetization of which can be derived using data from clinical trials when real-world data are yet to become available. Measures and assessment approaches are outlined to serve as a pragmatic tool for decision-makers in the US to ensure timely delivery and sustained access of clinically indicated therapies aimed to improve patient outcomes, enhance equity, and increase efficiency.

Advances in TherapyVol. 42(2)
University of Washington (US), University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), AbbVie (United States) (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Amgen, AbbVie, Alliance Healthcare Foundation, National Pharmaceutical Council, Arnold Ventures, Pacira BioSciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.