A phenomenological study of faculty members' beliefs about teaching-learning process

Purpose It is important to understand professors’ beliefs to promote better teacher preparation and professional development, as well as to understand the potential discrepancy between stated versus observed beliefs. The purpose of this study was to describe the faculty members' beliefs about the teaching-learning process. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative method was used to study the professors’ beliefs by selecting the faculty participants via a purposeful sampling strategy. The study was conducted at one of the biggest universities in Iran. In total, 20 professors were interviewed. Findings Analysis of the interviews indicates that professors’ beliefs about teaching and learning activities fall under four main themes (beliefs about teaching methods, beliefs about curriculum design, beliefs about students and beliefs about evaluation) and nine sub-themes. Originality/value Our findings reveal that professors have a deductive approach to teaching and learning, and due to the centralized educational system, they do not play a significant role in effectively presenting the curriculum. It seems necessary to direct professional development programs in rebuilding the professors' professional beliefs and identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-01-2024-0031
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phenomenological study of faculty members' beliefs about teaching-learning process

Talieh Saeidi Rezvani, Morteza Karami
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Education and Learning Interventions
article

A phenomenological study of faculty members' beliefs about teaching-learning process

Talieh Saeidi Rezvani, Morteza Karami
article en

Abstract

Purpose It is important to understand professors’ beliefs to promote better teacher preparation and professional development, as well as to understand the potential discrepancy between stated versus observed beliefs. The purpose of this study was to describe the faculty members' beliefs about the teaching-learning process. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative method was used to study the professors’ beliefs by selecting the faculty participants via a purposeful sampling strategy. The study was conducted at one of the biggest universities in Iran. In total, 20 professors were interviewed. Findings Analysis of the interviews indicates that professors’ beliefs about teaching and learning activities fall under four main themes (beliefs about teaching methods, beliefs about curriculum design, beliefs about students and beliefs about evaluation) and nine sub-themes. Originality/value Our findings reveal that professors have a deductive approach to teaching and learning, and due to the centralized educational system, they do not play a significant role in effectively presenting the curriculum. It seems necessary to direct professional development programs in rebuilding the professors' professional beliefs and identity.

Journal of Applied Research in Higher EducationVol. 18(1)
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A phenomenological study of faculty members' beliefs about teaching-learning process — Talieh Saeidi Rezvani, Morteza Karami · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS