The Public Trust in Science Scale: A Multilevel and Multidimensional Approach

We developed and validated the Public Trust in Science (PuTruS) Scale to recognize the multidimensional nature of the concept. Drawing on an epistemic understanding of trust in science as a perception, we integrate prior research on different levels of trust objects, emphasizing the importance of trust in scientists. In addition, we include transparency and dialogue orientation to reflect increased public engagement expectations. Data from two German online panel surveys ( n W1 = 3,439; n W2 = 1,030) points toward a five-dimensional structure (expertise, integrity, benevolence, transparency, dialogue orientation). For external validation, we used deference to scientific authority, conspiracy beliefs, and science populism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470241302758
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Public Trust in Science Scale: A Multilevel and Multidimensional Approach

Monika Taddicken, Justin T. Schröder, Anne Reif, Peter Weingart et al.
18 citations
Science Communication
Communication in Education and Healthcare
11.58
article

The Public Trust in Science Scale: A Multilevel and Multidimensional Approach

Monika Taddicken, Justin T. Schröder, Anne Reif, Peter Weingart, Lars Guenther
article en
18 citations

Abstract

We developed and validated the Public Trust in Science (PuTruS) Scale to recognize the multidimensional nature of the concept. Drawing on an epistemic understanding of trust in science as a perception, we integrate prior research on different levels of trust objects, emphasizing the importance of trust in scientists. In addition, we include transparency and dialogue orientation to reflect increased public engagement expectations. Data from two German online panel surveys ( n W1 = 3,439; n W2 = 1,030) points toward a five-dimensional structure (expertise, integrity, benevolence, transparency, dialogue orientation). For external validation, we used deference to scientific authority, conspiracy beliefs, and science populism.

Science CommunicationVol. 47(5)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
11.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.