A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence

There is an increasing demand for emerging scientists to improve their ability to communicate with public audiences, yet little research investigates the effectiveness of science communication training for graduate students. We responded to this need by developing SciWrite@URI-an interdisciplinary model for science graduate students designed around three learning outcomes based on tenets from the field of writing and rhetoric-habitual writing, multiple genres, and frequent review. SciWrite students completed courses and a science communication internship, attended writing workshops, and became tutors at a newly established Graduate Writing Center. After 2 years of training, students more frequently wrote multiple drafts and engaged in peer review, increased their confidence as writers, and decreased their apprehension about writing. We conclude the tenets of the SciWrite program helped students improve as science communicators, and we make suggestions for effective ways graduate departments and training programs might implement and build on our model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18594
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence

Jenna Morton‐Aiken, Scott R. McWilliams, Nancy E. Karraker, Ingrid E. Lofgren et al.
1 citations
PeerJ
Climate Change Communication and Perception
1.13
article

A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence

Jenna Morton‐Aiken, Scott R. McWilliams, Nancy E. Karraker, Ingrid E. Lofgren, Erin R. Harrington, Caroline Gottschalk Druschke, Elaine Finan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for emerging scientists to improve their ability to communicate with public audiences, yet little research investigates the effectiveness of science communication training for graduate students. We responded to this need by developing SciWrite@URI-an interdisciplinary model for science graduate students designed around three learning outcomes based on tenets from the field of writing and rhetoric-habitual writing, multiple genres, and frequent review. SciWrite students completed courses and a science communication internship, attended writing workshops, and became tutors at a newly established Graduate Writing Center. After 2 years of training, students more frequently wrote multiple drafts and engaged in peer review, increased their confidence as writers, and decreased their apprehension about writing. We conclude the tenets of the SciWrite program helped students improve as science communicators, and we make suggestions for effective ways graduate departments and training programs might implement and build on our model.

PeerJVol. 12
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Rhode Island (US), Brown University (US), Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US)
Yale University, Oregon State University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence — Jenna Morton‐Aiken, Scott R. McWilliams, et al. · PeerJ (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS