Escaping the resource curse: does resource dependence reduction mitigate income inequality?

This paper quantifies the impact of resource dependence reduction on income inequality. Using an exogenous shock triggered by China’s sustainable program for resource-based regions and prefecture-level data during 2004–2020, we perform a difference-in-differences estimation and find that reducing resource dependence has a sizable narrowing effect on urban-rural income gap. On average, the sustainable program reduces the gap (as measured by a ratio indicator) by 4.11%, with the effect being more pronounced in regions with initial low institutional quality. Further evidence suggests that the rise of labor-intensive industries and the increased rural investment, which benefit the poor more, help explain the narrowing effect. This paper sheds light on the sustainable development of resource-dependent regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04228-2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Escaping the resource curse: does resource dependence reduction mitigate income inequality?

Mengxu Li, Zhijiu Yang
4 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Natural Resources and Economic Development
3.31
article

Escaping the resource curse: does resource dependence reduction mitigate income inequality?

Mengxu Li, Zhijiu Yang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper quantifies the impact of resource dependence reduction on income inequality. Using an exogenous shock triggered by China’s sustainable program for resource-based regions and prefecture-level data during 2004–2020, we perform a difference-in-differences estimation and find that reducing resource dependence has a sizable narrowing effect on urban-rural income gap. On average, the sustainable program reduces the gap (as measured by a ratio indicator) by 4.11%, with the effect being more pronounced in regions with initial low institutional quality. Further evidence suggests that the rise of labor-intensive industries and the increased rural investment, which benefit the poor more, help explain the narrowing effect. This paper sheds light on the sustainable development of resource-dependent regions.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Jiangnan University (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
3.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.