BENCHMARKING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A STRATEGIC TOOL FOR ENHANCING PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

In examining the complexities of performance management within the public sector, this article critically assesses the utilization of benchmarking as a strategic mechanism for fostering both operational efficiency and accountability. Benchmarking serves as a comparative framework, enabling public institutions to evaluate their performance against peer organizations, thus facilitating the identification and adoption of best practices. The discussion underscores the dual benefits and constraints inherent in the process, particularly the importance of integrating both qualitative and quantitative metrics to achieve comprehensive evaluations. While the potential advantages—such as improved transparency, efficiency, and innovation—are notable, the analysis also acknowledges that the success of benchmarking initiatives may be compromised by existing cultural and political barriers.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Sciences and Applications
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37075/jomsa.2024.2.01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BENCHMARKING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A STRATEGIC TOOL FOR ENHANCING PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

1 citations
Journal of Management Sciences and Applications
Accounting and Organizational Management
0.53
article

BENCHMARKING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A STRATEGIC TOOL FOR ENHANCING PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

article en
1 citations

Abstract

In examining the complexities of performance management within the public sector, this article critically assesses the utilization of benchmarking as a strategic mechanism for fostering both operational efficiency and accountability. Benchmarking serves as a comparative framework, enabling public institutions to evaluate their performance against peer organizations, thus facilitating the identification and adoption of best practices. The discussion underscores the dual benefits and constraints inherent in the process, particularly the importance of integrating both qualitative and quantitative metrics to achieve comprehensive evaluations. While the potential advantages—such as improved transparency, efficiency, and innovation—are notable, the analysis also acknowledges that the success of benchmarking initiatives may be compromised by existing cultural and political barriers.

Journal of Management Sciences and ApplicationsVol. 3(2)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Accounting and Organizational Management
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.