Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges

Holographic Storage is an old idea that has always promised high density and fast random access, but has never been commercially competitive with Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid State Devices (SSDs). In Project HSD at Microsoft Research we asked the question: “Does holographic storage finally make sense for cloud storage?” This article describes our journey toward answering this question. We achieved 1.8× higher density than the previous state-of-the-art, using commodity components available today and leveraging machine learning to compensate for the noise and distortions introduced by commodity components. This uncovered two new challenges which are the focus of this article: achieving high end-to-end energy efficiency without sacrificing capacity, and spatial multiplexing without mechanical movement. Improving end-to-end energy efficiency requires joint optimization across low-level media parameters and higher-level system parameters that govern background maintenance operations such as read refresh and garbage collection. We developed new physics models of the media; analytic and simulation models of the media access and background media maintenance; and workload-driven optimization to find optimal parameter combinations. These techniques resulted in a 14× improvement over the previous approach for typical workloads without sacrificing capacity. We also designed the first scalable and mechanical movement free spatial multiplexing system for holographic storage. Despite these advances, we conclude that currently, holographic storage is still far from the combination of density, capacity scaling, and energy efficiency needed to compete with the incumbent technologies. We need fundamental advances in the physical media that improve energy efficiency by another 1–2 orders of magnitude without reducing data density. Further advances in optics are also required to achieve spatial multiplexing that is simultaneously scalable, low-loss, and high-density.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Storage
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3708993
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges

Benn C. Thomsen, Jannes Gladrow, Greg O’Shea, Pedro F. da Costa et al.
5 citations
ACM Transactions on Storage
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
1.74
article

Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges

Benn C. Thomsen, Jannes Gladrow, Greg O’Shea, Pedro F. da Costa, Dushyanth Narayanan, Antony Rowstron, Tony Mason, Grace Brennan, Pashmina Cameron, Michael Rudow, Giorgio Maltese, Nathanaël Cheriere, Soujanya Ponnapalli, Joowon Lim, Mengyang Yang, Theano Stavrinos, Jiaqi Chu, Douglas J. Kelly, Xingbo Wu, Alan Sanders, Guilherme Ilunga, Sarah Lewis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Holographic Storage is an old idea that has always promised high density and fast random access, but has never been commercially competitive with Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid State Devices (SSDs). In Project HSD at Microsoft Research we asked the question: “Does holographic storage finally make sense for cloud storage?” This article describes our journey toward answering this question. We achieved 1.8× higher density than the previous state-of-the-art, using commodity components available today and leveraging machine learning to compensate for the noise and distortions introduced by commodity components. This uncovered two new challenges which are the focus of this article: achieving high end-to-end energy efficiency without sacrificing capacity, and spatial multiplexing without mechanical movement. Improving end-to-end energy efficiency requires joint optimization across low-level media parameters and higher-level system parameters that govern background maintenance operations such as read refresh and garbage collection. We developed new physics models of the media; analytic and simulation models of the media access and background media maintenance; and workload-driven optimization to find optimal parameter combinations. These techniques resulted in a 14× improvement over the previous approach for typical workloads without sacrificing capacity. We also designed the first scalable and mechanical movement free spatial multiplexing system for holographic storage. Despite these advances, we conclude that currently, holographic storage is still far from the combination of density, capacity scaling, and energy efficiency needed to compete with the incumbent technologies. We need fundamental advances in the physical media that improve energy efficiency by another 1–2 orders of magnitude without reducing data density. Further advances in optics are also required to achieve spatial multiplexing that is simultaneously scalable, low-loss, and high-density.

ACM Transactions on StorageVol. 21(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of British Columbia (CA), King's College London (GB), University of Washington (US), Microsoft (Ireland) (IE), Amazon (United Kingdom) (GB), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Seattle University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), ASML (Netherlands) (NL), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.