Mechanisms of Social Risk Derivation and Diffusion in Public Health Emergency of International Concern

The risk derivation and diffusion during PHEIC have raised new requirements for national and social governance. This study builds a "Content-Media-Driving Forces" framework and conducts case analysis through theoretical review, which allows the classification of risks derived from PHEIC into two types: tangible risks and public opinion risks. Tangible risks are manifested as structural risks and process risks, while public opinion risks are represented by popular judgments and the moralization of criticism. In the process of risk evolution, tangible risks and public opinion risks form a complex network of interaction and resonance, resulting in a multi-point radiating pattern of risk derivation and diffusion. In social risk management, it is crucial to strictly regulate epidemic prevention measures, focusing on controlling process-based social risks, responding to public demands in a timely manner, and preventing the diffusion of public opinion that could lead to resonance between public opinion risks and other social risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of education, humanities and social sciences.
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70088/szszzy33
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of Social Risk Derivation and Diffusion in Public Health Emergency of International Concern

Jianguo Li, Di He
International journal of education, humanities and social sciences.
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Mechanisms of Social Risk Derivation and Diffusion in Public Health Emergency of International Concern

Jianguo Li, Di He
article en

Abstract

The risk derivation and diffusion during PHEIC have raised new requirements for national and social governance. This study builds a "Content-Media-Driving Forces" framework and conducts case analysis through theoretical review, which allows the classification of risks derived from PHEIC into two types: tangible risks and public opinion risks. Tangible risks are manifested as structural risks and process risks, while public opinion risks are represented by popular judgments and the moralization of criticism. In the process of risk evolution, tangible risks and public opinion risks form a complex network of interaction and resonance, resulting in a multi-point radiating pattern of risk derivation and diffusion. In social risk management, it is crucial to strictly regulate epidemic prevention measures, focusing on controlling process-based social risks, responding to public demands in a timely manner, and preventing the diffusion of public opinion that could lead to resonance between public opinion risks and other social risks.

International journal of education, humanities and social sciences.Vol. 1(1)
China University of Political Science and Law (CN), Nantong Science and Technology Bureau (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.