Assessing Pancreatic Fat and Its Correlation with Liver Fat in Suspected MASLD Patients Using Advanced Deep Learning Techniques from MRI Images

Pancreatic steatosis and metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease are characterised by fat accumulation in abdominal organs, but their correlation remains inconclusive. Recently proposed deep learning (DL) for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation, which quantifies organ fat, has primarily been assessed for quantifying liver fat. This study aims to validate DL models for pancreatic PDFF quantification and compare pancreas and liver fat content. We evaluated three DL models—Non-Linear Variables Neural Network (NLV-Net), U-Net, and Multi-Decoder Water-Fat separation Network—against a reference PDFF measured using a graph-cut-based method. NLV-Net showed a strong correlation (Spearman rho) with the reference PDFF in the six-echo pancreatic head (slope: 1.02, rho: 0.95) and body (slope: 1.04, rho: 0.94) and a moderate correlation in the three-echo pancreatic head (slope: 0.44, rho: 0.40) and body (slope: 0.49, rho: 0.34). Weak correlations were found between liver and pancreatic body PDFF using graph cut in six-echo (slope: −0.041, rho: −0.12) and three-echo images (slope: 0.0014, rho: 0.073) and using NLV-Net in six-echo (slope: −0.053, rho: −0.12) and three-echo images (slope: −0.014, rho: −0.033). In conclusion, NLV-Net showed the best agreement with the reference for pancreatic fat quantification, and no correlation was found between liver and pancreas fat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411924
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Pancreatic Fat and Its Correlation with Liver Fat in Suspected MASLD Patients Using Advanced Deep Learning Techniques from MRI Images

Yasmeen George, Enes Makalic, Sergio A. Uribe, Numan Kutaiba et al.
Applied Sciences
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Assessing Pancreatic Fat and Its Correlation with Liver Fat in Suspected MASLD Patients Using Advanced Deep Learning Techniques from MRI Images

Yasmeen George, Enes Makalic, Sergio A. Uribe, Numan Kutaiba, Juan Pablo Meneses, Nirusha Surendran, Hay Ching Cherrie Fung
article en

Abstract

Pancreatic steatosis and metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease are characterised by fat accumulation in abdominal organs, but their correlation remains inconclusive. Recently proposed deep learning (DL) for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation, which quantifies organ fat, has primarily been assessed for quantifying liver fat. This study aims to validate DL models for pancreatic PDFF quantification and compare pancreas and liver fat content. We evaluated three DL models—Non-Linear Variables Neural Network (NLV-Net), U-Net, and Multi-Decoder Water-Fat separation Network—against a reference PDFF measured using a graph-cut-based method. NLV-Net showed a strong correlation (Spearman rho) with the reference PDFF in the six-echo pancreatic head (slope: 1.02, rho: 0.95) and body (slope: 1.04, rho: 0.94) and a moderate correlation in the three-echo pancreatic head (slope: 0.44, rho: 0.40) and body (slope: 0.49, rho: 0.34). Weak correlations were found between liver and pancreatic body PDFF using graph cut in six-echo (slope: −0.041, rho: −0.12) and three-echo images (slope: 0.0014, rho: 0.073) and using NLV-Net in six-echo (slope: −0.053, rho: −0.12) and three-echo images (slope: −0.014, rho: −0.033). In conclusion, NLV-Net showed the best agreement with the reference for pancreatic fat quantification, and no correlation was found between liver and pancreas fat.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(24)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.