Minimum required sample size for modelling daily cyclic patterns in ecological momentary assessment data

Cyclical patterns in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data on emotions have remained relatively underresearched. Addressing such patterns can help to better understand emotion dynamics across time and contexts. However, no general rules of thumb are readily available for psychological researchers to determine the required sample size for measuring cyclical patterns in emotions. This study, therefore, estimates the minimum required sample sizes—in terms of the number of measurements per time period and subjects—to obtain a power of 80% given a certain underlying cyclical pattern based on input parameter values derived from an empirical EMA dataset. Estimated minimum required sample sizes varied between 50 subjects and 10 measurements per subject for accurately detecting cyclical patterns with a large magnitude, to 60 subjects and 30 measurements per subject for cyclical patterns of small magnitude. The resulting rules of thumb for sample sizes are discussed with a number of considerations in mind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methodology
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.11399
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum required sample size for modelling daily cyclic patterns in ecological momentary assessment data

Johan Lataster, Peter Verboon, Robin van de Maat
1 citations
Methodology
Mental Health Research Topics
0.51
article

Minimum required sample size for modelling daily cyclic patterns in ecological momentary assessment data

Johan Lataster, Peter Verboon, Robin van de Maat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cyclical patterns in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data on emotions have remained relatively underresearched. Addressing such patterns can help to better understand emotion dynamics across time and contexts. However, no general rules of thumb are readily available for psychological researchers to determine the required sample size for measuring cyclical patterns in emotions. This study, therefore, estimates the minimum required sample sizes—in terms of the number of measurements per time period and subjects—to obtain a power of 80% given a certain underlying cyclical pattern based on input parameter values derived from an empirical EMA dataset. Estimated minimum required sample sizes varied between 50 subjects and 10 measurements per subject for accurately detecting cyclical patterns with a large magnitude, to 60 subjects and 30 measurements per subject for cyclical patterns of small magnitude. The resulting rules of thumb for sample sizes are discussed with a number of considerations in mind.

MethodologyVol. 20(4)
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Mental Health Research Topics
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Minimum required sample size for modelling daily cyclic patterns in ecological momentary assessment data — Johan Lataster, Peter Verboon, et al. · Methodology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS