Second Language Motivational Selves and Interactional Pragmatics in Study Abroad: A Qualitative Study

The effects of individual differences factors on second language (L2) pragmatic competence are of interest to researchers because the development of L2 pragmatic competence is directly related to learners’ personal traits and their knowledge of contextual factors. In a study abroad (SA) setting, prior studies have found that despite the abundant learning affordances in an SA context, learners vary in their use of such opportunities, such as social contact, to increase L2 pragmatic competence. A key factor contributing to these varying outcomes is motivation. The most recent model of L2 motivation integrates regulatory focus theory, which combines learners’ L2 self-guides, emotional responses, such as anxiety and enjoyment, and their patterns of eager and vigilant L2 use, all of which are closely linked to L2 achievements. Adopting this integrated model of motivation, this study examined the connections between L2 motivational selves and pragmatic competence in interaction in a study abroad context. Participants were four U.S. learners of Chinese who studied and interned abroad in Fall 2021 and 2022. They completed a role-play task on pragmatics in interaction, a survey on learning background and social contact, a survey on L2 motivational selves, and a semi-structured interview on their study abroad experience. The results indicate that both L2 motivational selves and the quantity and quality of L2 social contact influence interactional pragmatics. We proposed three pedagogical implications related to individual difference factors (e.g., motivation and L2 exposure) to enhance L2 pragmatic learning in an SA context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Languages
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9120382
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Second Language Motivational Selves and Interactional Pragmatics in Study Abroad: A Qualitative Study

Feng Xiao, Jun Lang, Minghua Zhang
Languages
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Second Language Motivational Selves and Interactional Pragmatics in Study Abroad: A Qualitative Study

Feng Xiao, Jun Lang, Minghua Zhang
article en

Abstract

The effects of individual differences factors on second language (L2) pragmatic competence are of interest to researchers because the development of L2 pragmatic competence is directly related to learners’ personal traits and their knowledge of contextual factors. In a study abroad (SA) setting, prior studies have found that despite the abundant learning affordances in an SA context, learners vary in their use of such opportunities, such as social contact, to increase L2 pragmatic competence. A key factor contributing to these varying outcomes is motivation. The most recent model of L2 motivation integrates regulatory focus theory, which combines learners’ L2 self-guides, emotional responses, such as anxiety and enjoyment, and their patterns of eager and vigilant L2 use, all of which are closely linked to L2 achievements. Adopting this integrated model of motivation, this study examined the connections between L2 motivational selves and pragmatic competence in interaction in a study abroad context. Participants were four U.S. learners of Chinese who studied and interned abroad in Fall 2021 and 2022. They completed a role-play task on pragmatics in interaction, a survey on learning background and social contact, a survey on L2 motivational selves, and a semi-structured interview on their study abroad experience. The results indicate that both L2 motivational selves and the quantity and quality of L2 social contact influence interactional pragmatics. We proposed three pedagogical implications related to individual difference factors (e.g., motivation and L2 exposure) to enhance L2 pragmatic learning in an SA context.

LanguagesVol. 9(12)
Pomona College (US)
Pomona College
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.