Measuring service-dominant orientation (SDO): a firm-based approach
Purpose For developing and testing service-dominant logic (SDL)-based midrange theories of marketing, the operationalization of SDL into the managerial concept of service-dominant orientation (SDO) and its measures is imperative. However, existing scales found in the literature are insufficient and incomplete. This study aims to develop and validate an alternative firm-based scale for measuring SDO. Design/methodology/approach The established procedure for scale development was adopted which comprised three phases. First, a mix of qualitative study and literature deduction was applied to conceptualize and define SDO. Second, based on quantitative data (Study 1, N = 228 cases), scale development and refinement were undertaken. Finally, another data set (Study 2, N = 379 cases) was used to validate the scale. Findings SDO is defined as a set of managerial principles that govern all marketing processes and activities of a firm at strategic and operational levels so that they conform to SDL tenets. It is a second-order construct comprising four dimensions: customer solution, customer interaction, customer co-creation and system-based orientation. The suggested scale consists of 15 reflective items in total. Originality/value This SDO scale is viewed from and assessed by a firm’s strategic managers which covers all internal and external marketing aspects of the firm’s operation. It is different from a customer perspective or cultural perspective as used in the scales existing in the literature.
Authors
- Le Nguyen Hau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-473X)
- Nguyen Van Tuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-6743)
Institutions
- Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
- Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Management Research Review
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-07-2023-0531
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Service and Product Innovation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.44