Links Between Internal Variability and Forced Climate Feedbacks: The Importance of Patterns of Temperature Variability and Change

Abstract Understanding the relationships between internal variability and forced climate feedbacks is key for using observations to constrain future climate change. Here we probe and interpret the differences in these relationships between the climate change projections provided by the CMIP5 and CMIP6 experiment ensembles. We find that internal variability feedbacks better predict forced feedbacks in CMIP6 relative to CMIP5 by over 50%, and that the increased predictability derives primarily from the slow (>20 years) response to climate change. A key novel result is that the increased predictability is consistent with the higher resemblance between the patterns of internal and forced temperature changes in CMIP6, which suggests temperature pattern effects play a key role in predicting forced climate feedbacks. Despite the increased predictability, emergent constraints provided by observed internal variability are weak and largely unchanged from CMIP5 to CMIP6 due to the shortness of the observational record.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl112774
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Links Between Internal Variability and Forced Climate Feedbacks: The Importance of Patterns of Temperature Variability and Change

David W. J. Thompson, Luke Davis, Thomas Birner, Maria Rugenstein
5 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
1.41
article

Links Between Internal Variability and Forced Climate Feedbacks: The Importance of Patterns of Temperature Variability and Change

David W. J. Thompson, Luke Davis, Thomas Birner, Maria Rugenstein
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the relationships between internal variability and forced climate feedbacks is key for using observations to constrain future climate change. Here we probe and interpret the differences in these relationships between the climate change projections provided by the CMIP5 and CMIP6 experiment ensembles. We find that internal variability feedbacks better predict forced feedbacks in CMIP6 relative to CMIP5 by over 50%, and that the increased predictability derives primarily from the slow (>20 years) response to climate change. A key novel result is that the increased predictability is consistent with the higher resemblance between the patterns of internal and forced temperature changes in CMIP6, which suggests temperature pattern effects play a key role in predicting forced climate feedbacks. Despite the increased predictability, emergent constraints provided by observed internal variability are weak and largely unchanged from CMIP5 to CMIP6 due to the shortness of the observational record.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 51(24)
University of East Anglia (GB), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Royal Society, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Climate variability and models
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Links Between Internal Variability and Forced Climate Feedbacks: The Importance of Patterns of Temperature Variability and Change — David W. J. Thompson, Luke Davis, et al. · Geophysical Research Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS