Air versus supplemental oxygen for resuscitation of term or late preterm infants at birth
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective To assess the benefits and harms of air compared with supplemental oxygen for resuscitation of term or late preterm infants at birth in reducing rates of mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Secondary objectives To assess whether the benefits and harms of air compared with supplemental oxygen differ according to different oxygen concentrations, gestational age (GA), whether oxygen was titrated to saturation curves and the income of the study country.
Authors
- Jennifer A. Dawson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-6283)
- Michelle Fiander (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-9292)
- Peter G. Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-7314)
- Vincent D. Gaertner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-652X)
- Jane Cracknell
- Christoph M. Rüegger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-2625)
Institutions
- Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Vermont Oxford Network (US)
- University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
- Cochrane (CA)
- Cochrane (GB)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd014781
- Primary Topic
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00