Linguodidactic Principles and Content of Linguistic Disciplines of the Diachronic Cycle in the University Training of Philologists and Teachers of Literature

The relevance of considering modern approaches to teaching the history of the Russian language in the training of philologists and teachers of literature and at the university is unconditional, since the achievements of recent decades in linguistics and linguodidactics require the addition and updating of the traditional methodological platform in order for teaching to be effective. There is also no doubt that diachronic linguistic knowledge is in demand, because without it philological education will be flawed, will not give an understanding of the historical variability of the language and will not allow you to see the continuity of historical and modern linguistic transformations, to understand the causes and essence of modern linguistic processes and predict trends of future changes in the Russian language. The purpose of the article is to consider the linguodidactic methodology and the content of linguistic disciplines of the diachronic cycle in the context of modern philological education (using the example of the undergraduate and graduate curricula of the Transbaikal State University, which train teachers of literature and philology). The method of linguodidactic analysis of methodology is used, theoretical and practical content of disciplines on the history of the Russian language are discussed. Russian methodological and didactic principles, such as dialectical, historical-chronological, linguistic-cultural, continuity and argumentation, based on them, the content and practical tasks on the history of the Russian language, including tasks with individual examples and texts of different chronological sections of the language, including modern Russian, requiring historical and linguistic analysis and commentary contribute to effective formation of linguistic competence among students and undergraduates studying linguistic disciplines of the diachronic cycle. Russian history course programs are developed and implemented by future philologists and teachers of literature at the Transbaikal State University. The authors have showed the manifestation of the formulated methodological principles of teaching the history of the Russian language and revealed the features of linguodidactic methodology in the context of modern requirements of the educational standard and using examples of thematic planning of the content of linguistic disciplines of the diachronic cycle, various tasks and exercises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University Series Pedagogical Sciences
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21209/2658-7114-2024-19-4-16-26
Primary Topic
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguodidactic Principles and Content of Linguistic Disciplines of the Diachronic Cycle in the University Training of Philologists and Teachers of Literature

Tatiana Yu. Ignatovich, Yulia V. Biktimirova
Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University Series Pedagogical Sciences
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
article

Linguodidactic Principles and Content of Linguistic Disciplines of the Diachronic Cycle in the University Training of Philologists and Teachers of Literature

Tatiana Yu. Ignatovich, Yulia V. Biktimirova
article en

Abstract

The relevance of considering modern approaches to teaching the history of the Russian language in the training of philologists and teachers of literature and at the university is unconditional, since the achievements of recent decades in linguistics and linguodidactics require the addition and updating of the traditional methodological platform in order for teaching to be effective. There is also no doubt that diachronic linguistic knowledge is in demand, because without it philological education will be flawed, will not give an understanding of the historical variability of the language and will not allow you to see the continuity of historical and modern linguistic transformations, to understand the causes and essence of modern linguistic processes and predict trends of future changes in the Russian language. The purpose of the article is to consider the linguodidactic methodology and the content of linguistic disciplines of the diachronic cycle in the context of modern philological education (using the example of the undergraduate and graduate curricula of the Transbaikal State University, which train teachers of literature and philology). The method of linguodidactic analysis of methodology is used, theoretical and practical content of disciplines on the history of the Russian language are discussed. Russian methodological and didactic principles, such as dialectical, historical-chronological, linguistic-cultural, continuity and argumentation, based on them, the content and practical tasks on the history of the Russian language, including tasks with individual examples and texts of different chronological sections of the language, including modern Russian, requiring historical and linguistic analysis and commentary contribute to effective formation of linguistic competence among students and undergraduates studying linguistic disciplines of the diachronic cycle. Russian history course programs are developed and implemented by future philologists and teachers of literature at the Transbaikal State University. The authors have showed the manifestation of the formulated methodological principles of teaching the history of the Russian language and revealed the features of linguodidactic methodology in the context of modern requirements of the educational standard and using examples of thematic planning of the content of linguistic disciplines of the diachronic cycle, various tasks and exercises.

Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University Series Pedagogical SciencesVol. 19(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.