Pilot study comparison of developed and improved mass scale measurement capabilities
The objective of the Pilot Study was the calibration of sub-multiples of the kilogram, which was organised as a EURAMET Pilot Study in order to demonstrate a diagnostic comparison for the developed and improved Calibration Measurement Capability (CMC), while realising the mass scale of the participating National Measurement Institutes (NMIs). Due to the instability of some weights a simplified method was used to evaluate the results. It compares the laboratory result for each weight with the reference value obtained by the fitted weighted trendline, including the correlation due to the Consensus Value. It was the first time that the method of subdivision of a decade has been compared among laboratories by comparing the individual mass differences of the design matrix. The aim of improving capabilities and realising the mass scale with uncertainties of 1/3 mpe of the OIML Class E 1 tolerance was achieved by the participating NMIs.
Authors
- Andrea Malengo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-1288)
- Bianka Mangutova-Stoilkovska
- Zoltán Zelenka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-3736)
- George Popa
- Mariana Miteva
- Robert Hanrahan
- S Alisic
- Jaroslav Zůda
- Mieke Coenegrachts
- Damjan Pantić (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2523-9619)
- I. Kolozinsky
- Amel Alić
- A. Bolovan
- T. Petkov
Institutions
- National College of Ireland (IE)
- Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (AT)
- National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management (RO)
- Institute of Metrology of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA)
- Český metrologický institut (CZ)
- Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT)
- Bulgarian Institute of Metrology
- National Scientific Centre "Institute of Metrology"
- Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Measurement Sensors
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101354
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.46