Pilot study comparison of developed and improved mass scale measurement capabilities

The objective of the Pilot Study was the calibration of sub-multiples of the kilogram, which was organised as a EURAMET Pilot Study in order to demonstrate a diagnostic comparison for the developed and improved Calibration Measurement Capability (CMC), while realising the mass scale of the participating National Measurement Institutes (NMIs). Due to the instability of some weights a simplified method was used to evaluate the results. It compares the laboratory result for each weight with the reference value obtained by the fitted weighted trendline, including the correlation due to the Consensus Value. It was the first time that the method of subdivision of a decade has been compared among laboratories by comparing the individual mass differences of the design matrix. The aim of improving capabilities and realising the mass scale with uncertainties of 1/3 mpe of the OIML Class E 1 tolerance was achieved by the participating NMIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Sensors
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101354
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilot study comparison of developed and improved mass scale measurement capabilities

Andrea Malengo, Bianka Mangutova-Stoilkovska, Zoltán Zelenka, George Popa et al.
1 citations
Measurement Sensors
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
0.46
article

Pilot study comparison of developed and improved mass scale measurement capabilities

Andrea Malengo, Bianka Mangutova-Stoilkovska, Zoltán Zelenka, George Popa, Mariana Miteva, Robert Hanrahan, S Alisic, Jaroslav Zůda, Mieke Coenegrachts, Damjan Pantić, I. Kolozinsky, Amel Alić, A. Bolovan, T. Petkov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective of the Pilot Study was the calibration of sub-multiples of the kilogram, which was organised as a EURAMET Pilot Study in order to demonstrate a diagnostic comparison for the developed and improved Calibration Measurement Capability (CMC), while realising the mass scale of the participating National Measurement Institutes (NMIs). Due to the instability of some weights a simplified method was used to evaluate the results. It compares the laboratory result for each weight with the reference value obtained by the fitted weighted trendline, including the correlation due to the Consensus Value. It was the first time that the method of subdivision of a decade has been compared among laboratories by comparing the individual mass differences of the design matrix. The aim of improving capabilities and realising the mass scale with uncertainties of 1/3 mpe of the OIML Class E 1 tolerance was achieved by the participating NMIs.

Measurement SensorsVol. 38
National College of Ireland (IE), Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (AT), National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management (RO), Institute of Metrology of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BA), Český metrologický institut (CZ), Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT), Bulgarian Institute of Metrology, National Scientific Centre "Institute of Metrology", Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.