Resolution of Disputes in Infrastructure Projects: A Norwegian Perspective

The resolution of disputes is one of the most critical aspects of construction projects as it directly impacts the success of construction projects. The standard methods in which conflicts are usually resolved in the construction industry in Norway include negotiation, mediation, and litigation. Standard methods used at the international level include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This research work tried to establish the effectiveness of different dispute resolution mechanisms in Norway by conducting interviews with professionals dealing with construction disputes. Our study has found that PRIME is the most preferred approach in the Norwegian construction industry because it mainly focuses on negotiations and mediation, while lawsuits are the least preferred. It is in light of the excellent dispute resolution methods that the study should be tailor-made for the specific dispute and include all parties. Such findings would be significant as they would help in coming up with more appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms and, therefore, benefit the construction professionals and policymakers and furnish valuable insight into the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14124046
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolution of Disputes in Infrastructure Projects: A Norwegian Perspective

Amund Bruland, Olav Torp, Omar K. Sabri
3 citations
Buildings
Construction Project Management and Performance
1.47
article

Resolution of Disputes in Infrastructure Projects: A Norwegian Perspective

Amund Bruland, Olav Torp, Omar K. Sabri
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The resolution of disputes is one of the most critical aspects of construction projects as it directly impacts the success of construction projects. The standard methods in which conflicts are usually resolved in the construction industry in Norway include negotiation, mediation, and litigation. Standard methods used at the international level include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This research work tried to establish the effectiveness of different dispute resolution mechanisms in Norway by conducting interviews with professionals dealing with construction disputes. Our study has found that PRIME is the most preferred approach in the Norwegian construction industry because it mainly focuses on negotiations and mediation, while lawsuits are the least preferred. It is in light of the excellent dispute resolution methods that the study should be tailor-made for the specific dispute and include all parties. Such findings would be significant as they would help in coming up with more appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms and, therefore, benefit the construction professionals and policymakers and furnish valuable insight into the field.

BuildingsVol. 14(12)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Construction Project Management and Performance
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resolution of Disputes in Infrastructure Projects: A Norwegian Perspective — Amund Bruland, Olav Torp, et al. · Buildings (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS