Carbon allowance and stock return: evidence from EU companies

We investigate the relationship between carbon allowance and stock return. We argue in favor of the expense hypothesis: the relationship between stock returns and carbon allowance is negative due to the greater net impact (operational cost exceeds reputation benefit) of rising carbon price. To verify the hypothesis, we employ the modified Fama French 3 Factor Model. We employed data from 139 European Union companies which comprise 86 Carbon-Intensive (CI) companies and 59 Non-Carbon Intensive (NCI) companies. The data is of monthly frequency from January 2010 to October 2023. Augmented Mean Group estimator is applied due to the presence of cross section dependence and slope heterogeneity. We found that carbon allowance has a significant negative relationship with stock return in Carbon Intensive companies. Our result is robust under an array of checking schemes. The study shed a new light on the field of energy economics, especially on how investor response for carbon allowance adoption by companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Economics & Finance
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2441374
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon allowance and stock return: evidence from EU companies

Moch. Doddy Ariefianto, Richard Arlie, Christlyn Devina Susanto, Eurwyn Manggala
1 citations
Cogent Economics & Finance
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
1.13
article

Carbon allowance and stock return: evidence from EU companies

Moch. Doddy Ariefianto, Richard Arlie, Christlyn Devina Susanto, Eurwyn Manggala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between carbon allowance and stock return. We argue in favor of the expense hypothesis: the relationship between stock returns and carbon allowance is negative due to the greater net impact (operational cost exceeds reputation benefit) of rising carbon price. To verify the hypothesis, we employ the modified Fama French 3 Factor Model. We employed data from 139 European Union companies which comprise 86 Carbon-Intensive (CI) companies and 59 Non-Carbon Intensive (NCI) companies. The data is of monthly frequency from January 2010 to October 2023. Augmented Mean Group estimator is applied due to the presence of cross section dependence and slope heterogeneity. We found that carbon allowance has a significant negative relationship with stock return in Carbon Intensive companies. Our result is robust under an array of checking schemes. The study shed a new light on the field of energy economics, especially on how investor response for carbon allowance adoption by companies.

Cogent Economics & FinanceVol. 13(1)
Binus University (ID), College of Accounting (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.