The ‘media privilege’ in data protection law

This Art. examines the complex legal conflict between freedom of the press and the right todata protection, focusing on the European legal framework. The analysis explores the tensionbetween these two fundamental rights within the context of the European Court of HumanRights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ). A key element in thisdebate is the ‘media privilege’ under Article 85 of the General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR), which attempts to balance press freedom and data protection while leaving significantroom for national legislations to interpret and implement this balance. Through a detailedexamination of landmark cases such as Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v.Finland and Buivids, the article sheds light on the criteria courts use to weigh these competingrights. The study highlights how both courts navigate issues of journalistic activity in the digitalage, emphasizing the potential challenges brought by new media formats. The conclusionreflects on the evolving nature of these rights within Europe’s multi-level system, suggestingthat a cohesive approach remains a work in progress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimentos Social
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24220/2675-9160v5a2024e14794
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘media privilege’ in data protection law

Caroline Janssen
Revista de Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimentos Social
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

The ‘media privilege’ in data protection law

Caroline Janssen
article en

Abstract

This Art. examines the complex legal conflict between freedom of the press and the right todata protection, focusing on the European legal framework. The analysis explores the tensionbetween these two fundamental rights within the context of the European Court of HumanRights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ). A key element in thisdebate is the ‘media privilege’ under Article 85 of the General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR), which attempts to balance press freedom and data protection while leaving significantroom for national legislations to interpret and implement this balance. Through a detailedexamination of landmark cases such as Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v.Finland and Buivids, the article sheds light on the criteria courts use to weigh these competingrights. The study highlights how both courts navigate issues of journalistic activity in the digitalage, emphasizing the potential challenges brought by new media formats. The conclusionreflects on the evolving nature of these rights within Europe’s multi-level system, suggestingthat a cohesive approach remains a work in progress.

Revista de Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimentos SocialVol. 5
University of Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.