Frequency of mismatching surface colors in the wild

Colored surfaces may appear to match in one viewing condition but not in another, usually because of a change in illumination. The aim of this computational study was to estimate the frequency of mismatching outdoors under natural, uncontrolled, illumination changes, unlike the purely spectral changes in studies of illuminant metamerism. Data were taken from hyperspectral radiance images acquired at intervals of 1 min to more than 4 h. For pairs of randomly chosen surfaces in a scene, the relative frequency of their appearing initially the same and different later was around 10<sup>-4</sup> to 10<sup>-3</sup>, depending on color difference. However, if they already appeared the same, the relative frequency was higher, around 6% to over 60%, much higher than for illuminant metamerism, suggesting that real-world lighting changes may well impair surface identification by color.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.534385
Primary Topic
Color Science and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency of mismatching surface colors in the wild

David Foster
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Color Science and Applications
article

Frequency of mismatching surface colors in the wild

David Foster
article en

Abstract

Colored surfaces may appear to match in one viewing condition but not in another, usually because of a change in illumination. The aim of this computational study was to estimate the frequency of mismatching outdoors under natural, uncontrolled, illumination changes, unlike the purely spectral changes in studies of illuminant metamerism. Data were taken from hyperspectral radiance images acquired at intervals of 1 min to more than 4 h. For pairs of randomly chosen surfaces in a scene, the relative frequency of their appearing initially the same and different later was around 10<sup>-4</sup> to 10<sup>-3</sup>, depending on color difference. However, if they already appeared the same, the relative frequency was higher, around 6% to over 60%, much higher than for illuminant metamerism, suggesting that real-world lighting changes may well impair surface identification by color.

Journal of the Optical Society of America AVol. 42(5)
Leverhulme Trust, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Color Science and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.