Back to Business? Business‐Owners and Their Responses to COVID‐19 Policies in a Comparative Perspective

Abstract While necessary to protect human lives, many of the measures implemented by governments to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic imposed significant costs on the population. Drawing on an original representative survey fielded during the first wave of COVID‐19 in April–June 2020 in Sweden and Denmark, we examine how members of different occupational groups evaluated their government's pandemic strategies. Despite sharing several institutional, cultural, and political features, Denmark adopted an extensive lockdown, while Sweden largely relied on individual responsibility. We find that Danish business‐owners, whose incomes were more vulnerable to the economic costs of a strict lockdown, expressed lower trust and satisfaction in the national pandemic strategy and greater concern about the concentration of power by the government, compared to all other Danish occupational categories as well as to business‐owners in Sweden. Our findings thus indicate that exposure to the economic costs of pandemic strategies was not only associated with more critical views towards public health measures, but that it also made citizens more likely to see them as violations to democratic rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Political Studies
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12297
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Back to Business? Business‐Owners and Their Responses to COVID‐19 Policies in a Comparative Perspective

Agustín Goenaga, Julie Hassing Nielsen
Scandinavian Political Studies
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Back to Business? Business‐Owners and Their Responses to COVID‐19 Policies in a Comparative Perspective

Agustín Goenaga, Julie Hassing Nielsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract While necessary to protect human lives, many of the measures implemented by governments to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic imposed significant costs on the population. Drawing on an original representative survey fielded during the first wave of COVID‐19 in April–June 2020 in Sweden and Denmark, we examine how members of different occupational groups evaluated their government's pandemic strategies. Despite sharing several institutional, cultural, and political features, Denmark adopted an extensive lockdown, while Sweden largely relied on individual responsibility. We find that Danish business‐owners, whose incomes were more vulnerable to the economic costs of a strict lockdown, expressed lower trust and satisfaction in the national pandemic strategy and greater concern about the concentration of power by the government, compared to all other Danish occupational categories as well as to business‐owners in Sweden. Our findings thus indicate that exposure to the economic costs of pandemic strategies was not only associated with more critical views towards public health measures, but that it also made citizens more likely to see them as violations to democratic rights.

Scandinavian Political StudiesVol. 48(1)
Lund University (SE)
Lunds Universitet
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.