Estimating received level in behavioral response studies through the use of ancillary data

Marine mammals are known to respond to various human noises, including and in certain cases, strongly, to military active sonar. Responses include small and short-term changes in diving behavior, horizontal avoidance of an ensonified area, and mass strandings. Considerable research has been conducted using short-term biologging tags to understand these responses. Yet researchers and managers want a better understanding of responses to sound over longer periods of time in a variety of contexts. The Atlantic Behavioral Response Study examines responses across multiple spatial and temporal scales using vessel-based focal follows, short-term biologging tags, and medium-term satellite transmitting tags. Since the latter do not record sound, we must intersect positions with a sound propagation model to estimate received sound pressure levels. We use all available information from (1) the observed x,y positions from the tag(s) and from focal follow vessels; (2) the discrete depth bin data (z) from the tag; (3) ocean bathymetry; and (4) outputs from sound propagation models. All these disparate streams of data contain varying levels of error in x, y, or z. We account for as much uncertainty as possible and include here a refined approach to better estimate the range of sound levels received by animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034617
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating received level in behavioral response studies through the use of ancillary data

Robert S. Schick, John E. Joseph, Tetyana Margolina, Zachary T. Swaim et al.
2 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Marine animal studies overview
0.92
article

Estimating received level in behavioral response studies through the use of ancillary data

Robert S. Schick, John E. Joseph, Tetyana Margolina, Zachary T. Swaim, Heather J. Foley, Brandon L. Southall, William R. Cioffi, Larry Zheng, Nicholas A. Kaney
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Marine mammals are known to respond to various human noises, including and in certain cases, strongly, to military active sonar. Responses include small and short-term changes in diving behavior, horizontal avoidance of an ensonified area, and mass strandings. Considerable research has been conducted using short-term biologging tags to understand these responses. Yet researchers and managers want a better understanding of responses to sound over longer periods of time in a variety of contexts. The Atlantic Behavioral Response Study examines responses across multiple spatial and temporal scales using vessel-based focal follows, short-term biologging tags, and medium-term satellite transmitting tags. Since the latter do not record sound, we must intersect positions with a sound propagation model to estimate received sound pressure levels. We use all available information from (1) the observed x,y positions from the tag(s) and from focal follow vessels; (2) the discrete depth bin data (z) from the tag; (3) ocean bathymetry; and (4) outputs from sound propagation models. All these disparate streams of data contain varying levels of error in x, y, or z. We account for as much uncertainty as possible and include here a refined approach to better estimate the range of sound levels received by animals.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(6)
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), Duke University (US), Naval Postgraduate School (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center (US), Southall Environmental Associates (United States) (US), University of South Carolina Beaufort (US)
U.S. Fleet Forces Command
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Marine animal studies overview
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.