Color statistics of images created by generative AI

Novel digital images are increasingly created using generative AI tools. However, how well these AI images reflect the color statistics of human-generated ("real") images is unknown. We analyzed hue, chroma, and lightness distributions for image objects and backgrounds created by three generative AI models (Open AI DALL E 2, Stability AI Dreamstudio, and Adobe Firefly) and for real images (Bing image search); <i>N</i>=8400 images. We found that, although AI images had similar mean hues to real images, AI images systematically exhibited statistical anomalies, including narrower tunings for hue, chroma, and lightness, and higher correlations between their objects and backgrounds. While a conscious, perceptual appraisal may consider AI images to be high-fidelity, our results indicate that AI images are underpinned by color statistics that are unnatural for visual sensation. As generative AI increasingly dominates the creation of novel digital media, we may experience a narrowing of our color diet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.545030
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Color statistics of images created by generative AI

Osman B. Kavcar, Daniel S. Joyce, Yujin Wang
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Color statistics of images created by generative AI

Osman B. Kavcar, Daniel S. Joyce, Yujin Wang
article en

Abstract

Novel digital images are increasingly created using generative AI tools. However, how well these AI images reflect the color statistics of human-generated ("real") images is unknown. We analyzed hue, chroma, and lightness distributions for image objects and backgrounds created by three generative AI models (Open AI DALL E 2, Stability AI Dreamstudio, and Adobe Firefly) and for real images (Bing image search); <i>N</i>=8400 images. We found that, although AI images had similar mean hues to real images, AI images systematically exhibited statistical anomalies, including narrower tunings for hue, chroma, and lightness, and higher correlations between their objects and backgrounds. While a conscious, perceptual appraisal may consider AI images to be high-fidelity, our results indicate that AI images are underpinned by color statistics that are unnatural for visual sensation. As generative AI increasingly dominates the creation of novel digital media, we may experience a narrowing of our color diet.

Journal of the Optical Society of America AVol. 42(5)
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Color statistics of images created by generative AI — Osman B. Kavcar, Daniel S. Joyce, et al. · Journal of the Optical Society of America A (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS