The Role of Local Anesthesia Methods on the Development of Wound Infection at Upper Extremity Lacerations

Objective: This study was designed to identify whether the application method of a local anesthetic agent before suturing affects the development of wound infection. Materials and Methods: Adult patients with upper extremity lacerations were randomized into two groups if they required wound repair with simple sutures. Direct infiltration of a local anesthetic was performed in patients in Group 1, whereas parallel margin infiltration was performed in patients in Group 2. After 1 week, patients were evaluated clinically by different physicians who were blinded to the patients’ wound infection. Results: A total of 164 patients were enrolled in the study, but 144 were available for data analysis. 4 patients [1 patient was in group 1 (1/73, 1.4%), 3 patients were in group 2 (3/71, 4.2%)] were found to have an infection during the follow-up visit. Conclusion: The application method of the local anesthetic agent before suturing does not affect the development of wound infection. There were no statistically significant differences related to the development of infection between the two methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Emergency and Critical Care
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/globecc.galenos.2024.72691
Primary Topic
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Local Anesthesia Methods on the Development of Wound Infection at Upper Extremity Lacerations

Özge Onur, Mustafa Altun, Haldun Akoğlu, Erhan Altunbaş et al.
Global Emergency and Critical Care
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
article

The Role of Local Anesthesia Methods on the Development of Wound Infection at Upper Extremity Lacerations

Özge Onur, Mustafa Altun, Haldun Akoğlu, Erhan Altunbaş, Arzu Denizbaşı, Serhad Ömercikoğlu, Oğuzhan Demir, Eren Onur Karavin
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to identify whether the application method of a local anesthetic agent before suturing affects the development of wound infection. Materials and Methods: Adult patients with upper extremity lacerations were randomized into two groups if they required wound repair with simple sutures. Direct infiltration of a local anesthetic was performed in patients in Group 1, whereas parallel margin infiltration was performed in patients in Group 2. After 1 week, patients were evaluated clinically by different physicians who were blinded to the patients’ wound infection. Results: A total of 164 patients were enrolled in the study, but 144 were available for data analysis. 4 patients [1 patient was in group 1 (1/73, 1.4%), 3 patients were in group 2 (3/71, 4.2%)] were found to have an infection during the follow-up visit. Conclusion: The application method of the local anesthetic agent before suturing does not affect the development of wound infection. There were no statistically significant differences related to the development of infection between the two methods.

Global Emergency and Critical CareVol. 3(3)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.