Changes of Ankle Motion and Ground Reaction Force Using Elastic Neutral AFO in Neurological Patients with Inverted Foot During Gait

Many stroke patients develop ankle deformities due to neurological or non-neurological factors, resulting in abnormal gait patterns. While Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used to address these issues, few are specifically designed for ankle varus. The Elastic Neutral Ankle-Foot Orthosis (EN-AFO) was developed for this purpose. This study aimed to analyze changes in kinematic and kinetic gait data in stroke patients with ankle varus, comparing those walking with and without EN-AFO in both AFO and No-AFO groups. Initially, 30 stroke patients with ankle varus were screened; after exclusions, 17 were included in the final analysis. In the No-AFO group, EN-AFO significantly improved maximal ankle inversion on the affected side during the swing phase (from 4.63 ± 13.26 to 10.56 ± 11.40, p = 0.025). Similarly, in the AFO group, EN-AFO led to a significant improvement in maximal ankle inversion on the less-affected side during the swing phase (from 7.95 ± 10.11 to 12.01 ± 8.64, p = 0.021). Additionally, ground reaction forces on the affected side of the AFO group significantly increased at both the forefoot (from 182.76 ± 61.45 to 211.55 ± 70.57, p = 0.038) and hindfoot (from 210.67 ± 107.88 to 231.85 ± 105.38, p = 0.038) with EN-AFO. Conversely, maximal and minimal thoracic axial rotation on the affected side improved significantly in the No-AFO group compared to the AFO group with EN-AFO, during both the stance and swing phases (stance phase: max improvement from −1.13 ± 1.80 to 4.83 ± 8.05, min improvement from −1.06 ± 2.45 to 5.89 ± 7.56; swing phase: max improvement from −1.33 ± 2.13 to 5.49 ± 7.82, min improvement from −1.24 ± 2.43 to 5.95 ± 7.12; max p = 0.034, min p = 0.016 during stance; max p = 0.027, min p = 0.012 during swing). Furthermore, both maximal and minimal thoracic axial rotation on the less-affected side during the swing phase improved significantly in the No-AFO group (max improvement from −2.09 ± 4.18 to 6.04 ± 6.90, min improvement from −0.47 ± 2.13 to 8.18 ± 10.45; max p = 0.027, min p = 0.012) compared with the AFO group. These findings suggest that EN-AFO may effectively improve gait in stroke patients with ankle varus in the No-AFO group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actuators
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/act13120526
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes of Ankle Motion and Ground Reaction Force Using Elastic Neutral AFO in Neurological Patients with Inverted Foot During Gait

Young-In Hwang, Du-Jin Park
Actuators
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Changes of Ankle Motion and Ground Reaction Force Using Elastic Neutral AFO in Neurological Patients with Inverted Foot During Gait

Young-In Hwang, Du-Jin Park
article en

Abstract

Many stroke patients develop ankle deformities due to neurological or non-neurological factors, resulting in abnormal gait patterns. While Ankle-Foot Orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used to address these issues, few are specifically designed for ankle varus. The Elastic Neutral Ankle-Foot Orthosis (EN-AFO) was developed for this purpose. This study aimed to analyze changes in kinematic and kinetic gait data in stroke patients with ankle varus, comparing those walking with and without EN-AFO in both AFO and No-AFO groups. Initially, 30 stroke patients with ankle varus were screened; after exclusions, 17 were included in the final analysis. In the No-AFO group, EN-AFO significantly improved maximal ankle inversion on the affected side during the swing phase (from 4.63 ± 13.26 to 10.56 ± 11.40, p = 0.025). Similarly, in the AFO group, EN-AFO led to a significant improvement in maximal ankle inversion on the less-affected side during the swing phase (from 7.95 ± 10.11 to 12.01 ± 8.64, p = 0.021). Additionally, ground reaction forces on the affected side of the AFO group significantly increased at both the forefoot (from 182.76 ± 61.45 to 211.55 ± 70.57, p = 0.038) and hindfoot (from 210.67 ± 107.88 to 231.85 ± 105.38, p = 0.038) with EN-AFO. Conversely, maximal and minimal thoracic axial rotation on the affected side improved significantly in the No-AFO group compared to the AFO group with EN-AFO, during both the stance and swing phases (stance phase: max improvement from −1.13 ± 1.80 to 4.83 ± 8.05, min improvement from −1.06 ± 2.45 to 5.89 ± 7.56; swing phase: max improvement from −1.33 ± 2.13 to 5.49 ± 7.82, min improvement from −1.24 ± 2.43 to 5.95 ± 7.12; max p = 0.034, min p = 0.016 during stance; max p = 0.027, min p = 0.012 during swing). Furthermore, both maximal and minimal thoracic axial rotation on the less-affected side during the swing phase improved significantly in the No-AFO group (max improvement from −2.09 ± 4.18 to 6.04 ± 6.90, min improvement from −0.47 ± 2.13 to 8.18 ± 10.45; max p = 0.027, min p = 0.012) compared with the AFO group. These findings suggest that EN-AFO may effectively improve gait in stroke patients with ankle varus in the No-AFO group.

ActuatorsVol. 13(12)
Catholic University of Pusan (KR), Hoseo University (KR), Institute for Basic Science (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.