Greenland Ice Sheet Elevation Change From CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2

Abstract Although fluctuations in ice sheet surface mass balance lead to seasonal and interannual elevation changes, it is unclear if they are resolved differently by radar and laser satellite altimeters. We compare methods of computing elevation change from CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2 over the Greenland Ice Sheet to assess their consistency and to quantify recent change. Solutions exist such that interannual trends in the interior and the ablation zone agree to within −0.2 ± 1.5 and 3.3 ± 6.0 cm/yr, respectively, and that seasonal cycle amplitudes within the ablation zone agree to within 3.5 ± 38.0 cm. The agreement is best in the north where the measurements are relatively dense and worst in the southeast where the terrain is rugged. Using both missions, we estimate Greenland lost 196 ± 37 km 3 /yr of volume between 2010 and 2022 with an interannual variability of 129 km 3 /yr.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl110822
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenland Ice Sheet Elevation Change From CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2

Nitin Ravinder, Lin Gilbert, Thomas Slater, Inès Otosaka et al.
8 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Cryospheric studies and observations
3.01
article

Greenland Ice Sheet Elevation Change From CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2

Nitin Ravinder, Lin Gilbert, Thomas Slater, Inès Otosaka, Andrew Shepherd, Alan Muir
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Although fluctuations in ice sheet surface mass balance lead to seasonal and interannual elevation changes, it is unclear if they are resolved differently by radar and laser satellite altimeters. We compare methods of computing elevation change from CryoSat‐2 and ICESat‐2 over the Greenland Ice Sheet to assess their consistency and to quantify recent change. Solutions exist such that interannual trends in the interior and the ablation zone agree to within −0.2 ± 1.5 and 3.3 ± 6.0 cm/yr, respectively, and that seasonal cycle amplitudes within the ablation zone agree to within 3.5 ± 38.0 cm. The agreement is best in the north where the measurements are relatively dense and worst in the southeast where the terrain is rugged. Using both missions, we estimate Greenland lost 196 ± 37 km 3 /yr of volume between 2010 and 2022 with an interannual variability of 129 km 3 /yr.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 51(24)
University of Leeds (GB), Northumbria University (GB), Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling (GB), University College London (GB)
European Space Agency, Sight Research UK, European Commission, Natural Environment Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cryospheric studies and observations
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.