LPA3: Pharmacodynamic Differences Between Lysophosphatidic Acid and Oleoyl-Methoxy Glycerophosphothionate: Biased Agonism, Two Sites

Background: Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor 3 (LPA3) is involved in many physiological and pathophysiological actions of this bioactive lipid, particularly in cancer. The actions of LPA and oleoyl-methoxy glycerophosphothionate (OMPT) were compared in LPA3-transfected HEK 293 cells. Methods: Receptor phosphorylation, ERK 1/2 activation, LPA3-β-arrestin 2 interaction, and changes in intracellular calcium were analyzed. Results: Our data indicate that LPA and OMPT increased LPA3 phosphorylation, OMPT being considerably more potent than LPA. OMPT was also more potent than LPA to activate ERK 1/2. In contrast, OMPT was less effective in increasing intracellular calcium than LPA. The LPA-induced LPA3-β-arrestin 2 interaction was fast and robust, whereas that induced by OMPT was only detected at 60 min of incubation. LPA- and OMPT-induced receptor internalization was fast, but that induced by OMPT was more marked. LPA-induced internalization was blocked by Pitstop 2, whereas OMPT-induced receptor internalization was partially inhibited by Pitstop 2 and Filipin and entirely by the combination of both. When LPA-stimulated cells were rechallenged with 1 µM LPA, hardly any response was detected, i.e., a “refractory” state was induced. However, a conspicuous and robust response was observed if OMPT was used as the second stimulus. Conclusions: The differences in these agents’ actions suggest that OMPT is a biased agonist. These findings suggest that two binding sites for these agonists might exist in the LPA3 receptor, one showing a very high affinity for OMPT and another likely shared by LPA and OMPT (structural analogs) with lower affinity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Receptors
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3040029
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LPA3: Pharmacodynamic Differences Between Lysophosphatidic Acid and Oleoyl-Methoxy Glycerophosphothionate: Biased Agonism, Two Sites

Juan Carlos Martínez-Morales, J. Adolfo Garcı́a-Sáinz, K. Helivier Solís, Ruth Rincón-Heredia et al.
5 citations
Receptors
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
1.17
article

LPA3: Pharmacodynamic Differences Between Lysophosphatidic Acid and Oleoyl-Methoxy Glycerophosphothionate: Biased Agonism, Two Sites

Juan Carlos Martínez-Morales, J. Adolfo Garcı́a-Sáinz, K. Helivier Solís, Ruth Rincón-Heredia, M. Teresa Romero-Ávila
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Background: Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor 3 (LPA3) is involved in many physiological and pathophysiological actions of this bioactive lipid, particularly in cancer. The actions of LPA and oleoyl-methoxy glycerophosphothionate (OMPT) were compared in LPA3-transfected HEK 293 cells. Methods: Receptor phosphorylation, ERK 1/2 activation, LPA3-β-arrestin 2 interaction, and changes in intracellular calcium were analyzed. Results: Our data indicate that LPA and OMPT increased LPA3 phosphorylation, OMPT being considerably more potent than LPA. OMPT was also more potent than LPA to activate ERK 1/2. In contrast, OMPT was less effective in increasing intracellular calcium than LPA. The LPA-induced LPA3-β-arrestin 2 interaction was fast and robust, whereas that induced by OMPT was only detected at 60 min of incubation. LPA- and OMPT-induced receptor internalization was fast, but that induced by OMPT was more marked. LPA-induced internalization was blocked by Pitstop 2, whereas OMPT-induced receptor internalization was partially inhibited by Pitstop 2 and Filipin and entirely by the combination of both. When LPA-stimulated cells were rechallenged with 1 µM LPA, hardly any response was detected, i.e., a “refractory” state was induced. However, a conspicuous and robust response was observed if OMPT was used as the second stimulus. Conclusions: The differences in these agents’ actions suggest that OMPT is a biased agonist. These findings suggest that two binding sites for these agonists might exist in the LPA3 receptor, one showing a very high affinity for OMPT and another likely shared by LPA and OMPT (structural analogs) with lower affinity.

ReceptorsVol. 3(4)
Center for Engineering and Industrial Development (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.