Social Learning Through Water Games in the Field

Economic experiments have traditionally been used as a tool for measuring human behavior in different contexts of social interaction. However, little has been discussed so far on the role of experiments as tools for learning and social change. We conducted a series of educational interventions in two municipal aqueducts in Guasca, Colombia using an irrigation collective action game where five people must decide over contributions to produce water and decide on the sequential allocation of the resource over an irrigation system. We used this setting as a pedagogical tool for understanding the effects of learning over a series of repetitions of these experiments to explore changes in the behaviors and attitudes of rural households in the sample. We ran two waves of games a few months apart with most of the same sample of 200 participants. In one of these aqueducts, we held workshops with the community to provide feedback on the results of the games. In both waves of the experiments, we find a powerful effect of face-to-face communication to improve both group efficiency in the provision of water and fairness in its distribution. Our results suggest that there are processes of learning from one wave to the next that could provide valuable lessons about the possibilities and difficulties that collective action faces within communities. In particular, we find that the workshop for discussing the results may have an effect on creating a better climate for the next wave of games, particularly with respect to average contributions and fair allocation across players. A combination of the experiments and the workshop increased individual cooperation levels, while also inducing upstream players to restrain themselves in extracting water, allowing players downstream to acquire more of the resource.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Economics and Policy
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x24400083
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Learning Through Water Games in the Field

Laia Domènech, Juan-Camilo Cárdenas, Paula Sarmiento, Ruth Meinzen‐Dick et al.
1 citations
Water Economics and Policy
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
article

Social Learning Through Water Games in the Field

Laia Domènech, Juan-Camilo Cárdenas, Paula Sarmiento, Ruth Meinzen‐Dick, A. Bernal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Economic experiments have traditionally been used as a tool for measuring human behavior in different contexts of social interaction. However, little has been discussed so far on the role of experiments as tools for learning and social change. We conducted a series of educational interventions in two municipal aqueducts in Guasca, Colombia using an irrigation collective action game where five people must decide over contributions to produce water and decide on the sequential allocation of the resource over an irrigation system. We used this setting as a pedagogical tool for understanding the effects of learning over a series of repetitions of these experiments to explore changes in the behaviors and attitudes of rural households in the sample. We ran two waves of games a few months apart with most of the same sample of 200 participants. In one of these aqueducts, we held workshops with the community to provide feedback on the results of the games. In both waves of the experiments, we find a powerful effect of face-to-face communication to improve both group efficiency in the provision of water and fairness in its distribution. Our results suggest that there are processes of learning from one wave to the next that could provide valuable lessons about the possibilities and difficulties that collective action faces within communities. In particular, we find that the workshop for discussing the results may have an effect on creating a better climate for the next wave of games, particularly with respect to average contributions and fair allocation across players. A combination of the experiments and the workshop increased individual cooperation levels, while also inducing upstream players to restrain themselves in extracting water, allowing players downstream to acquire more of the resource.

Water Economics and PolicyVol. 11(01)
International Food Policy Research Institute (US), Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Duke University (US), Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Institute for Environmental Policy (CZ), Universidad de Los Andes (BO), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.